Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Commentariat: Janet Albrechtsen knows best

By Helen Pringle - posted Tuesday, 12 June 2007


Ah Mamdouh, we hardly knew ye - at least, not like Janet knows ye.

Albrechtsen also really knows David Hicks better than anyone else. Two weeks ago, when Hicks was returned to Australia, Janet pushed to the front of the media line, saying, “let me be the first to welcome home David Hicks”. She also offered to help him write his memoirs because his friends don’t know him like she does.

Albrechtsen went beyond Hicks’s guilty plea to the US military commission and rehearsed his earlier “admissions” - such as when he called himself a “well-trained and practical soldier” in letters to his father.

Advertisement

But the clincher for Albrechtsen was a passage from a letter Hicks had written from Guantánamo Bay to former flatmate, Louise Fletcher:

Listen, have you got any friends I can f*** when I get home? They have to be good-looking and I prefer big tits as well. Well, send their photos with the letters so I can check them out.

If any real doubts remained that Hicks’s admissions to the US military commission provide an ex post facto justification for his disentitlement to the right of habeas corpus and the presumption of innocence, then Albrechtsen believes that Hicks’s desire to f*** good-looking women with big tits should dispel them.

But on these grounds, who among Australian (heterosexual) men would ’scape whipping?

Arguments about the rule of law need a more serious and considered forum than Albrechtsen provides.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. All

First published in New Matilda on May 30, 2007.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

26 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Helen Pringle is in the Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences at the University of New South Wales. Her research has been widely recognised by awards from Princeton University, the Fulbright Foundation, the Australian Federation of University Women, and the Universities of Adelaide, Wollongong and NSW. Her main fields of expertise are human rights, ethics in public life, and political theory.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Helen Pringle

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Helen Pringle
Article Tools
Comment 26 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy