Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

The debate is far from over

By Ben-Peter Terpstra - posted Thursday, 24 May 2007


For sure, children must be given a fair and balanced view of current issues in small doses. But the media tells children otherwise. The real debate (we never had), they falsely claim, is over. Then, they pile on, and on, and on.

Apparently, “the gun debate” is also over, “the abortion debate” is over, and even the “capital punishment debate” is over (in spite of the fact that over 50 per cent of Australians support the death penalty). In other words, whenever the cultural left is lost for words, the debate is always over. Then, they pile on, and on, and on.

Funnily enough, in Stalin’s Red Russia, the “debate over Christianity” was always over too. And, how long will sceptics have to wait to hear that the “debate” over “global warming” is over for the 100th time? Translation: shut up, and stop thinking.

Advertisement

“I got the impression that instead of going out to shoot the birds, I should go out and shoot the kids who shoot the birds,” said Paul Watson, the overwrought co-founder of Greenpeace in Access to Energy, December 1982.

The debate is over? Today, Channel 7’s campaigning journalists treat Greenpeace’s talking points as indisputable facts. Revealingly, “fair debate” in this country is reduced to listening to Captain Planet’s recycled monologues.

And consider this: “We in the Green movement,” said Carl Amery of the Green Party in Mensch & Energie, April, 1983, “aspire to a cultural model in which the killing of a forest will be considered more contemptible and more criminal than the sale of six-year-old children to Asian brothels.” The debate is over?

Perhaps our watchdog media needs to reexamine the root causes of this “green” movement. In 2007, the writing and presenting classes seem more emotionally invested in proclaiming the rights of “drowning polar bears” over defenceless children in brothels.

Ignore the fact that many scientists are breaking ranks. The very “debate is over” argument, to be sure, was always cultic in nature. Science shouldn’t ever be based on a show of hands, or Channel Seven’s Sunrise show sermons. Verifying facts, questioning hypotheses, and so on, is not a sign of weakness, but one of strength. The rest is garbage.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

22 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Ben-Peter Terpstra has provided commentary for The Daily Caller (Washington D.C.), NewsReal Blog (Los Angeles), Quadrant (Sydney), and Menzies House (Adelaide).

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Ben-Peter Terpstra

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 22 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy