Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Right to withdraw labour is a human right

By Tristan Ewins - posted Tuesday, 24 April 2007


Furthermore, the lack of any right to strike action as a form of political protest makes actions such as the famous “Green Bans” of the 1970s, or the kind of general strike action taken recently by French unions against regressive labour “reform” literally criminal. This winds back basic human rights beyond what is tolerable for any nation, let alone a country such as Australia - which is a signatory to the relevant ILO conventions.

Several questions are also unanswered. How many protected conditions will be reintroduced in what Julia Gillard has claimed will be a “simplified Award system”? And to what extent will restrictions on trade union organisation be removed? In particular: will union organisers have their right of entry to workplaces restored?

That such issues are still in question is very troubling. Without the return of a more detailed system of Awards, protecting a range of minimum wages and conditions in any given industry, the industrially weak will stand to be marginalised, and driven to accept a “bare minimum” “safety net”.

Advertisement

Some trade union leaders have come out against Rudd’s proposals for the ALP Platform, but by and large the response from the ACTU and elsewhere has been resigned and muted. Victorian Electrical Trades Union Secretary, Dean Mighell was one who dared raise his head above the parapet:

"We will be putting it on the other unions: do not accept anti-union behaviour. The right to strike, secret ballots and abolition of the right to campaign for industry agreements are fundamental … We don't want Labor adopting silly IR policies just to be seen to distance themselves from the union movement. I think it is anti-union. To abolish industry-wide agreements is crazy."

Secretary of the Victorian Trades Hall Council, Brian Boyd and Australian Manufacturing Workers Union Secretary, Doug Cameron have also expressed concern. Cameron’s concern was swiftly rebuked by Rudd, however, with little in the way of resistance or response by the trade union leader. The Labor leader’s sharp, almost abusive response was intended to cow Cameron into submission: to force him into a corner where Rudd was effectively saying: “it’s either my credibility or yours”.

Boyd, also, while maintaining in-principle opposition to Rudd’s position, indicated he may be willing to hold his tongue to avoid a conflict.

Without leadership now, therefore, it appears Rudd’s position is likely to prevail with barely a whimper: with a pre-conference stitch-up reducing ALP internal democracy to a media stunt.

Notably, however, The Greens have provided a media release condemning the Labor leader’s position, quoting Bob Brown:

Advertisement

"There is now little difference between the ALP and Coalition on the right of workers to take industrial action. The Greens are committed to an unfettered, legal right to strike as a fundamental right of workers to promote and defend their economic and social interests.”

This raises another question. If the ALP will not stand up to be counted as the party of organised labour in this country, perhaps the ACTU would be better placed not “putting all its eggs in one basket”. Perhaps unions ought to inform members of the policies of other parties, such as The Greens, thus pressuring the ALP to be less equivocal in supporting its union base.

The author has been a member of the ALP for well over a decade now, but I am beyond the bankrupt philosophy: “my party right or wrong”. Rudd is riding high in the polls: he can afford resistance to his position at the ALP National Conference, and can adapt to meet any broader campaign for labour rights that might follow.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. 4
  6. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

69 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Tristan Ewins has a PhD and is a freelance writer, qualified teacher and social commentator based in Melbourne, Australia. He is also a long-time member of the Socialist Left of the Australian Labor Party (ALP). He blogs at Left Focus, ALP Socialist Left Forum and the Movement for a Democratic Mixed Economy.
.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Tristan Ewins

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Tristan Ewins
Article Tools
Comment 69 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy