Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

PM's tactics muzzle media

By Sally Young - posted Friday, 20 April 2007


Some of Mr Howard's favourite interviewers are considered to be especially gentle with him. Others see themselves as "entertainers" rather than journalists. Few have the policy experience of a veteran press gallery reporter.

Even if they do ask probing questions, as Neil Mitchell has noted, John Howard is a particularly effective "manipulator of interviews. He is very, very good at steering an interview in the direction he wants it to go."

How does he do this? I studied Mr Howard's television and radio interviews in March 2003 when he was arguing the case for Australia to be involved in the Iraq war. One of his key techniques is repetition. Mr Howard repeats one line, with only minor variations, over and over. On Iraq it was: "If Iraq is allowed to retain chemical and biological weapons, other rogue states will develop theirs. The more rogue states that have them, the greater the risk that they will get into the hands of terrorists."

Advertisement

He managed to repeat this regardless of the question being asked and even when no question had been asked at all.

This is what media advisers call staying on message, and it is not unusual in a veteran politician. George W. Bush and Tony Blair did the same. Mr Bush also repeated words such as "terrorism" and "threat" while Mr Blair mentioned WMD in every speech he gave at the time.

In interviews, Mr Howard's media skills make it difficult to question him effectively. Regardless of their ingenuity, interviewers consistently get the same answers. The Prime Minister is also skilled at evading questions he doesn't want to answer. He does this by challenging the relevance of the question, chastising the interviewer for using a "hypothetical" or making the interviewer sound impolite ("Just let me finish" or "Well, can I answer the question?").

The radio interview is the Prime Minister's favourite medium. He is very effective in it and he's argued that it's a more democratic way to talk to the public. But it is also a way of taking his message out of reach of the press gallery, and the way politicians have limited and controlled media access has had a major impact on how Australian politics is reported.

In Australia, the press gallery is now frequently accused of acting as "a pack", of writing the same stories, using the same angles. But this may be because they have to rely on the same pool of material.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All

First published in The Age on April 15, 2007.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

28 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Sally Young is a senior lecturer in media and communications at Melbourne University.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Sally Young

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 28 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy