Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Hicks: guilty means guilty, sort of ...

By Mirko Bagaric - posted Wednesday, 28 March 2007


It is notoriously difficult to get reliable data on how many innocent people plead guilty as a result of such pressures. The best data comes from research carried out in the United Kingdom for the Royal Commission on Criminal Justice, which suggests that up to 11 per cent of people who plead guilty claim innocence.

Of course these figures are likely to be inflated given that accused have an interest in protesting their innocence. Yet, as the Royal Commission noted, the risk of innocent people being pressured into pleading guilty “cannot be avoided and although there can be no certainty as to the numbers ... it would be naive to suppose” that it does not happen.

There are sound pragmatic reasons for maintaining the sentencing discount for offenders that plead guilty. It saves taxpayers the cost of running expensive trials and spares victims the turmoil of reliving their experiences in court.

Advertisement

But there are no principled reasons for not compensating accused people who beat criminal charges for their legal fees and time served in custody. People wrongly charged with serious criminal offences in Australia will continue to have undue pressure applied on them to plead guilty until legislation is introduced in all jurisdictions remedying this situation.

And as for Hicks, the speculation about his actual guilt is pointless. He is guilty - certainly no less than accused people in Australia who plead guilty to serious criminal offences.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

65 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Mirko Bagaric, BA LLB(Hons) LLM PhD (Monash), is a Croatian born Australian based author and lawyer who writes on law and moral and political philosophy. He is dean of law at Swinburne University and author of Australian Human Rights Law.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Mirko Bagaric

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Mirko Bagaric
Article Tools
Comment 65 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy