Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Bring a plate, barrack for the team - don't care where you come from ...

By Emma Dawson - posted Friday, 30 March 2007


The answer, unfortunately, is pretty simple. John Howard hates multiculturalism: always has, always will. He’s on the record as decrying the concept as “divisive”, although he has learned to temper his rhetoric somewhat since his disastrous 1988 statements about the need to limit immigration from Asia.

Howard’s not a racist, in the old-fashioned sense of the word. There’s little to suggest that he would condemn someone purely on the basis of his or her skin colour. More accurately, Howard is a cultural imperialist. He sees white, western culture as superior to all other cultures, and hasn’t the generosity of spirit or imagination to appreciate the benefits of other world-views, nor the lessons that could be learned from other cultures. He’s a “my way or the highway” kind of guy.

This is an inherently illiberal position, as our last true liberal prime minister, Malcolm Fraser, has repeatedly pointed out.

Advertisement

Australian multiculturalism, insofar as it was a policy rather than a state of mind, never sought to undermine the central tenets of Australia’s liberal democracy, such as the rule of law, the equality of men and women, and the freedom of speech. Rather, it recognised that people’s personal identities were complex, multi-layered things, informed by their ancestry and cultural backgrounds as much as by their current lives and recent experiences.

That everyone has an inherent right to his or her own personal identity, and to form that identity without fear or favour, and free from the intervention of the state, is the very basis of liberal ideology.

If John Howard can’t refrain from imposing his own personal cultural identity on the rest of the nation, then he’s no business calling himself a liberal any more.

Moreover, if he isn’t proud of Australia’s achievements in building a harmonious, multicultural society, and insists on referring to the ideas of our former colonial master, Britain, and, more recently, bending to the will of the great western superpower the USA, then perhaps he’s no business being the Australian prime minister, either.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All

This is an edited extract of Emma Dawson's address to the Australian Fabians forum Multiculturalism - rumours of its demise are greatly exaggerated: taking on Howard’s bête noire, held on March 7, 2007.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

32 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Emma Dawson is a fellow of the non-partisan think tank Oz Prospect, and a member of the ALP.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Emma Dawson

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 32 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy