Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Breathing new life into our tired public debate

By Paul Kildea - posted Monday, 19 March 2007


One proposal is to devote a national holiday to public deliberation. A “Deliberation Day” would be held in the lead-up to national elections, and all voters would be invited to listen to different candidates and engage in group discussions. Attendance might be thought of as a core civic obligation, like jury duty.

The cost would be high, but the payoff would be a political debate that is far more meaningful. Our politicians would have to adjust to an electorate that is more informed on key issues, and the development of a more deliberative citizenry could transform public dialogue.

The deliberative poll model is relatively new, and more research needs to be done. This is where governments can step in. The polls are expensive to run, but the potential benefits are great enough that public investment is justified.

Advertisement

It is disappointing that the federal government did not send a single representative to the deliberative poll in Canberra. It can reassure voters that it supports an informed and engaged citizenry by investing in deliberative polling, and initiatives like it, which seek to improve the quality of public debate.

In an election year, when both major parties will seek any advantage they can, the need for moderate, informed debate could not be clearer.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

14 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Paul Kildea is a doctoral candidate in political science at the University of New South Wales and was a Group Manager at the deliberative poll.

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 14 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy