Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Exploring the US culture of torture

By Ken Macnab - posted Wednesday, 14 March 2007


These dealt with key components such as the definition of “torture”, and “treatment or punishment”, the level of culpable intent, the scope and duration of the treatment, and the sending of suspects to other states. They “legalised” the current psychologically-devised torture practices based on SERE and the three Ds - “debility, dependency and dread” - and, as was intended, severely limited America's commitment to the Convention.

Since 2001 this position has been further eroded by Bush Government legal officers and department administrators, not to mention secret directives and activities.

The history of American torture after the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, and the announcement of a “War on Terror” by President Bush, incorporated and enhanced the foundations laid during the Cold War.

Advertisement

Mike Otterman analyses in exhaustive detail the steps which led to the creation of a network of prisons in Afghanistan, Iraq and Cuba, where the United States now holds more than 14,000 prisoners, and routinely subjects them to ill-treatment and torture (by any reasonable definition) without legal justification or international accountability.

By claiming that America is involved in yet another “new” struggle for survival, that it is justified in doing “whatever it takes”, that its detainees are “unlawful combatants” not covered by any of the laws about justice and human rights, and that SERE-based torture was simply what President Bush called an “alternative set of procedures”, the United States Government has created and defended a widespread “culture of torture”.

The prisons at Bagram, Guantanamo and Abu Ghraib now represent an appalling example of inhumanity and injustice. Moreover, as Otterman reveals, a string of Department of Justice legal opinions, a series of Defense and CIA memos and regulations, a range of Government “security” legislation and frequent “opinions” by leading office-bearers, have combined to create an entirely separate sphere of “prerogative law”, within which certain Government agencies operate, quite apart from the “normative” law protected by statute and enforced by an independent judiciary.

Within this cocoon, the CIA can torture with impunity, and act as a model for others.

One striking aspect of Otterman's book is the extent to which particular themes run consistently through his analysis of American torture, linking the decades of the Cold War with the current War on Terror.

Another is the extent of the information available about the torture of a whole series of individuals, whose treatment Otterman uses to illustrate the practices being researched and put into training manuals by the “experts”.

Advertisement

Finally, Otterman uses the evidence to substantiate a series of hard-hitting points by way of conclusion. Torture is both immoral and illegal. Torture is self-defeating: it abandons moral authority and generates fresh enemies. Torture is unnecessary: it can never supply the vital clue in the so-called “ticking bomb” scenario. Torture does not yield reliable information: it inevitably produces confessions designed to please interrogators and stop the pain. It is worth noting that this has always been known. Torture is corruptive: it spreads beyond its confines and corrupts its users. Finally, SERE techniques constitute torture, despite all the euphemisms, and they profoundly disrupt the body and mind, leaving permanent damage.

This is an impressive book, which casts a harsh light on an area of modern conflict with critical human rights implications. It also illustrates an old adage: “Those who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it.” Torquemada and the authors of Malleus Maleficarum would be at home in Abu Ghraib, Guantanamo and the CIA.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. All

Michael Otterman, American Torture: from the Cold War to Abu Ghraib and Beyond (Melbourne University Press, 2007).



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

16 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Dr Ken Macnab is an historian and President of the Centre for Peace and Conflict Studies (CPACS) at the University of Sydney.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Ken Macnab
Related Links
Michael Otterman's American Torture website

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 16 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy