Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Pure water wasted

By Patrick Troy - posted Friday, 23 February 2007


The crisis of water supply to our cities is now of tragi-comic dimension.

A grandstand of politicians of all persuasions offers ever bigger engineering fixes. Proposals include massive new dams, large-scale water recycling, new pipelines and costly desalination plants.

None can be readily implemented; all are expensive; none will help cities cope with climate change; all have major environmental consequences. Each, in short, is a mirage.

Advertisement

The proposals all seek to maintain or increase the supply of potable (drinking quality) water. The reality is that 90 per cent of water used in households need not be of that quality.

In Australia, using potable water to flush a toilet is disturbingly wasteful. When this practice began in the 1880s there was a ready supply of potable water for the then attractive novelty of body waste disposal. Things have changed substantially since then.

Southeast Queensland now faces a crisis that exposes the flawed thinking that shaped our historical approach to urban infrastructure, especially for water and sewage.

There are, however, straightforward technological and behavioural changes that can help us out of the water shortage mess. Australian water authorities need to overcome their entrenched scepticism and resistance towards these changes.

Brisbane's demand for potable water could be greatly reduced by using dry composting toilets and or by using on-site treatment and recycling of grey water to flush toilets.

Using on-site recycling of grey water or rainwater in the laundry could significantly reduce use of potable water. Bathroom use, including showers, accounts for about a quarter of household water consumption.

Advertisement

Grey water from the bathroom could be treated and stored on site for use in the laundry, for toilet flushing or garden watering.

Recent attempts at changing water consumption have had limited success because they do not attack the problem in a fundamental way.

Increasing the price is one common approach to reducing consumption. This misunderstands the nature of water demand and the way it is affected by cultural and behavioural factors such as fashion in hair care and clothing. It also overestimates the public's ability and willingness to reduce basic water-using activities, such as bathing and domestic cleaning.

Moreover, a significant proportion of households live in flats that are not separately metered, so they have little idea of, or concern for, how much water they use (or how much it costs). Flat dwellers tend to believe water shortage is caused not by their consumption but by those who live in houses.

Significant water price rises also have serious equity effects. Doubling the price may have no effect on high-income households but can be onerous for low-income or larger households.

Rather than focus on "big engineering" proposals to increase supply, we should develop measures that encourage (and eventually require) households and businesses to harvest and treat much of their own water. This would require a program to capture and store rainwater for domestic consumption. All new dwellings could be required to install rainwater tanks of reasonable size to supply water for bathroom use. This would not only give households some responsibility but would also provide them with a degree of security in their own supply.

All new dwellings could be required to install greywater recycling systems that store treated water for uses that do not need potable water. An extensive program to retrofit older areas with rainwater tanks and greywater treatment and recycling systems also should be implemented.

Households would become more responsible for the quality of their own recycled grey water and would thus be encouraged to use detergents and cleaning agents that have low levels of phosphate and sodium. That would reduce the amount of these chemicals in sewage and make it easier to treat.

Ultimately, water authorities should be required to deliver a small supply of water to households as their environmental right. But this need not be more than 20 kilolitres a person a year - sufficient to meet their water needs for drinking and food preparation.

Water authorities would thus meet their original remit as suppliers of potable water. They could develop their role as health agencies responsible for sanitation services without using potable water to deliver them.

The ultimate goal is decentralised water supply and sewerage networks that would be vastly more sustainable and secure than the systems that are failing us now.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. All

First published in The Courier-Mail on February 13, 2007.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

25 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Professor Patrick Troy AO is Emeritus Professor and Visiting Fellow at the Fenner School of Environment and Society, Australian National University, Adjunct Professor in the Uban Research Program at Griffith University and Visiting Professor in the City Futures Research Centre, Faculty of the Built Environment, University of New South Wales.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Patrick Troy

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 25 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy