Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Winning five elections may be an ask too far

By Peter Tucker - posted Friday, 16 February 2007


A second reason why 2007 is not 2004 revisited, is that Kevin Rudd is not Mark Latham. Latham just scared the pants off voters. I have written previously in On Line Opinion on what I believe opposition leaders need to do to have their best chance of getting elected (using, in that instance, a West Australian election as a case study), and everything I see in Mark Latham and Kevin Rudd confirms my views.

Voters judge opposition leaders much more harshly and with much less tolerance than the incumbent leader, and so far Rudd has managed to operate largely within this narrow band.

Opposition leaders have to be seen to be safe, capable and with perhaps a few good, but not scary, ideas. They never (or rarely; maybe and only maybe a case for Whitlam) “sweep” or “muscle” their way into office. Boring I know, but boring has worked for Howard up to now and it is working just fine for Rudd.

Advertisement

My final point is simply that winning five elections, if history is any guide, is nearly always an ask too far. Put simply, the “cost of government” just wears governments down.

Yes, I know this is the era of the incumbent, due largely to risk-averse voters not wanting to upset the economic apple-cart, but in the end voters will weary of a government. Are they simply sick of the sight of John Howard? Maybe that is the message in the polls over the last 12 months? Relaxed and comfortable can look like yesterday’s man very quickly. Nothing personal, John, perhaps is their message, but a fresh face on the box would be nice.

My intention in this article is not to predict who will win the 2007 election but rather to challenge the orthodox thinking that we are in some sort of ground-hog cycle where at every election a wily John Howard pulls a victory out of the hat. Opinion polls have their uses and their failings, but in this instance I think they help tell a story: this election is not a foregone conclusion and has not been for some considerable time.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

15 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Peter Tucker has worked in Tasmania as an advisor for the Liberals in opposition and in ministerial offices for both Labor and Liberal governments. He is author of the Tasmanian Politics website, and is a researcher at the University of Tasmania’s School of Government.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Peter Tucker
Related Links
New Matilda: Polls that Count by Michale Brissenden

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Peter Tucker
Article Tools
Comment 15 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy