Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Private sector Nobel Prizes

By Tom Quirk - posted Wednesday, 17 January 2007


Even IBM in the 1980’s allowed researchers to try to measure the mass of the neutrino, the smallest and least interactive of nuclear particles. The supposed justification was if the neutrino had mass then the universe might not go on forever and IBM would not have a continuing business.

The last 15 years have not seen more prizes going to the big industrial research laboratories. Part of the explanation may be that IBM and Bell Laboratories are changed companies. IBM no longer dominates computing. Lucent Technologies, the successor to AT&T struggles with Bell Laboratories.

Also the culture has changed. The big corporations used to reflect the East Coast US philosophy of corporations doing and controlling everything relevant to their business. This might include a central research laboratory that could be a reflection of university departments. But, with the West Coast corporations, the approach was more co-operative with technology spread over a number of independent companies, many acting as suppliers of components or equipment. As the centre of technical innovation moved to California, the East Coast businesses lost their markets and their corporate model was abandoned.

Advertisement

Thus we now see Intel, Microsoft, Cisco and others, all the equal financially of the older East Coast corporations. There may not be a central research function. Laureates have emerged from this distributed system. The integrated circuit was a prize winning device and Kary Mullis (1993), inventor of the Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) while at Cetus, now part of Chiron, is perhaps the first of a line from the new biology frontier.

Unlike Einstein, Marshall and Warren, these industrial researchers did not make their discoveries in their own time. Their research directors encouraged them to explore their fields, even though few discoveries directly benefited their corporations. It was part of the corporate culture of the time and it brought great kudos to the organisation. It may have helped recruit bright engineers and scientists.

In Australia in the 1990’s, BHP closed a number of research centres, as did ICI.

What of the Australian government? Do these events point to a new approach to national needs, distributed research funding and to reappraising the role of the CSIRO?

For policy makers, the private sector achievements are an example of the likely success of national needs. Corporations have corporate needs but scientific research frequently delivers to a wider community without direct or immediate benefit to the corporation. Discoveries achieve technical utility through diverse pathways. Finally from the West Coast of the US there are signs that plurality is important in creating a more vibrant technical and business environment.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All
Advertisement
 Institute of Public Affairs Advertisement

 

Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Tom Quirk is a director of Sementis Limited a privately owned biotechnology company. He has been Chairman of the Victorian Rail Track Corporation, Deputy Chairman of Victorian Energy Networks and Peptech Limited as well as a director of Biota Holdings Limited He worked in CRA Ltd setting up new businesses and also for James D. Wolfensohn in a New York based venture capital fund. He spent 15 years as an experimental research physicist, university lecturer and Oxford don.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Tom Quirk

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment Comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Latest from Institute of Public Affairs
 No reality holiday from this population challenge
 For budgets only smaller is tougher
 Government subsidies to green groups must end
 Boot-strapping on a carbon tax
 West's history not complete without reference to Christianity
 More...
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy