Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Best blog posts '06

By Ken Parish and Nicholas Gruen - posted Tuesday, 2 January 2007


As someone once asked, so this is Christmas - and what have you done?

Well in the lead up to Christmas 2006 a few people, some of whom regard themselves as friends but none of whom knew each other a couple of years ago, were hard at work on an anthology of what they thought were the best blog posts of 2006.

Today one can say "blog" and most people get it. But then some still don't know that a "blog" is one of those nerdy jargon expressions, chosen at least in part for its quizzical unattractiveness, as a shortening of the expression "weblog".

Advertisement

A weblog can be anything you want it to be, but the simplest way of explaining it is to say that it's like a diary kept as a public document on the web - with provision made for people to comment on the "diary entries", though in the new lingo the diary entries are "posts" and each post together with responses to it is a "thread".

An interactive diary kept on the Internet can be on any subject - and so there are literary blogs, gossip blogs and blogs carrying similar content to op-ed columns.

Our Best Blogs of 2006 - rapidly and inevitably abbreviated by us all to BB06 -  are the offspring of a process which itself illustrates the remarkable aspects of the new medium. On the December 11, 2006 Troppo carried Ken Parish's review of Black Inc's Best Australian Essays of 2006. Troppo poster Nicholas Gruen, who had an essay in the volume, had proposed to its publisher Black Inc, that it do something that's becoming increasingly common - send a book to a prominent blogger for review, in this case Ken Parish.

The broadly favourable review nevertheless suggested that the collection suffered from insufficient exposure to the "blogosphere". So in the comments thread, Gruen suggested "So why don't we produce an anthology?". Ken Parish was the obvious editor-in-chief having recently committed himself to producing "Missing Link" a thrice-weekly review of blog posts of interest but he wasn't interested in taking on the task himself.

No problem! At that stage the "self-organising" aspects of collaboration on the Internet took over. A method was proposed whereby people could nominate their own, or someone else's, best three. And a hastily cobbled together committee of volunteers would help Ken compile a short list from which he would be the final judge of the best blogs for 2006.

The committee was Ken Parish, Nicholas Gruen, Helen Dale and Meika Loofs Samorzewski. Having co-operated in producing a shortlist, Ken then chose the best blogs with Nicholas acting as a sounding board.

Advertisement

The process embodied the strengths of blogging and more generally of the new wave of "user-produced content" on the Internet - the most spectacular examples of which are open source software such as the Linux/GNU operating system and the online encyclopaedia Wikipedia.

Where it had taken Black Inc many months to produce its anthology of essays, BB06 was compiled in a little over two weeks. And you won't have to pay to read them. They're all already available right now on the Internet - if you know where to find them. And you'll know where to find each of them as they will be published again in On Line Opinion throughout January.

Some of the authors will have taken the opportunity to review their work for republication and you'll get the choice of joining the new discussion they initiate on OLO, or following the link provided to the original post where the discussion may begin anew!

Some caveats and explanations are in order. Obviously any collection of this sort is a product of the editors' ideas of what makes for a quality blog post. Though we didn't agree on formal criteria, the informal criteria were that, "best" posts needed to be substantial enough to escape the ephemeral nature of much blogging; they had to be well written; and they had to have some independent merit by way of special knowledge, a worthwhile point of view, insight or literary quality.

In short, we hoped that our choices would be appreciated by those who went to the posts effectively on our recommendation.

As enthusiasts, we were also keen to show off the new genre to those to whom it might be new, and so we tried to choose a collection which illustrated the variety and the unique strengths of the medium. We also placed a limit of two on items by any individual blogger - though no limits on posts from group blogs such as Sarsparilla or Larvatus Prodeo.

Then of course there's the human factor. Blog posts could not be considered if they were not nominated, and the nominations would have carried their own biases. Those who heard about BB06 were those reading Troppo or the seven blogs that linked to the relevant thread - which included both left and right leaning group blogs such as Lavatus Prodeo and Catallaxy. The collection represents our opinions and our tastes (and where there were small differences in opinion), Ken's opinion took presidence.

And while we're boasting about the speed with which the collection was produced, we should also apologise that of course we would have liked to have taken a bit more time. If we do this next year (which we're intending to) we'll start a little earlier and give the process more time, indeed, given its existence, commenters will no doubt nominate posts - either formally by sending Ken an e-mail, or informally by registering a comment - throughout 2007.

The speed with which it has all happened means it may have passed some great bloggers by. They may have been enjoying their Christmas break and been quite oblivious to our entreaties. So some posts that deserve to be here inevitably won't be.

If you think we've slipped up, please let us know - in comments below or by way of an e-mail. And remember us in November next year.

Finally, when we first posted inviting submissions, some people were censorious about the idea of blog awards.  Didn't they go against the grain of such a personal medium? In fact we'd never said we intended to award any gongs, just to present an anthology of the "best of". Views on the pros and cons of gongs differed among both the blogging community and the editorial committee. Even so, the kinds of dilemmas faced when choosing what one regards as the best 40 blog posts are essentially the same as those faced when choosing the best single item.

While we didn't intend to award any gongs, and we're not (necessarily) trying to establish a precedent, one post has stood out since long before this collection was a twinkle in our eye. From the time it was first posted, "Barista" David Tiley's extraordinary ruminations on his hospitalisation earlier this year had bloggers linking to it from everywhere.  Even if we didn't think it was the best, which I think we all do, David's remarkable post certainly wins this years "people's choice" as the most renowned post of 2006. Thanks David, and thanks to everyone who participated, and everyone who will read these essays.

We hope they make what contribution they can to ensuring you have a happy and a prosperous new year.

Ken Parish and Nicholas Gruen

Postscript: Since penning this introduction On Line Opinion has proposed that readers nominate their favourite posts.  We have chosen 40 of the best posts so far, but because it's a good idea, the more so because it makes use of the way the internet allows a remarkable freedom to improvise, because we've put this together in a hurry and we'll have lots of time to get it right next time, we're also happy to consider further nominations for best posts through the January period and will announce some new winners in a few week's time.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. All

This article is an introduction to "Best Blogs of 2006" a feature in collaboration with Club Troppo, and edited by Ken Parish, Nicholas Gruen et al.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

10 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Authors

Ken Parish is a Darwin-based lawyer and former Labor member of the Northern Territory Legislative Assembly. He now teaches (mostly public law subjects) at Charles Darwin University, where he founded Australia's first fully online external law degree program. Ken is no longer associated with any political party, describing himself as a "committed sceptic".

Dr Nicholas Gruen is CEO of Lateral Economics and Chairman of Peach Refund Mortgage Broker. He is working on a book entitled Reimagining Economic Reform.

Other articles by these Authors

All articles by Ken Parish
All articles by Nicholas Gruen
Related Links
Catallaxy
Club Troppo
Larvatus Prodeo
Sarsparilla

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 10 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy