Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Trust us

By Tilman Ruff - posted Friday, 17 November 2006


The processing of Australian uranium in China prior to enrichment is not subject to safeguards, which only begin to apply at the enrichment stage. And the one organisation - the China National Nuclear Corporation - manages nuclear materials and facilities for both power and weapons purposes. Australians have little reason to be confident in such arrangements.

It is almost 30 years after the Fox Inquiry established by a previous coalition government characterised nuclear safeguards as providing “an illusion of protection”, and since then the frailty of this illusion has been repeatedly demonstrated - in Iraq, Libya, Iran and North Korea. Since then Australian safeguards have also progressively been watered down, for example in allowing blanket advance, or “programmatic”, approval for reprocessing of spent nuclear fuel to extract plutonium.

This is the most proliferation-sensitive of nuclear processes, which is technically impossible to effectively safeguard. China is an authoritarian state with an appalling record of proliferation of sensitive nuclear and missile materials, technology and know-how to other countries. The nuclear weapons designs sold by the international nuclear black market headed by Pakistani scientist AQ Khan were Chinese. Yet the government asks us to trust their assurances on safeguards on Australian uranium and that these will apply to every future government of Australia and China and their instrumentalities and all the companies involved, and whatever succeeds them, essentially forever. Now that is utopian.

Advertisement

Australian uranium used in nuclear reactors can end up as either radioactive waste, or fissile material for weapons. The safeguards applied to Australian uranium, reflected in the agreement signed with China, do in truth provide only an illusion of protection.

At best, Australian uranium would indirectly contribute to weapons by expanding the pool of uranium China says it needs for both power and weapons. At worst, Australian uranium could be directly used in Chinese nuclear weapons, or in nuclear weapons elsewhere. Under current and proposed safeguards, Australians could sleep easy only because if this happened, there would be no way they would ever know.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. All

Both the executive summary and the full report are available online from the ACF and MAPW websites.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

8 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Tilman Ruff is Associate Professor in the Nossal Institute for Global Health, University of Melbourne and Australian chair of the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Tilman Ruff

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 8 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy