Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

UN reform calls for strong resolution

By Syed Atiq ul Hassan - posted Friday, 25 August 2006


India is already trying to become a permanent Security Council member, and it’s on the agenda of a growing number of nations also to become permanent members and have the benefit of the veto power to save themselves from the foreign threats.

It is interesting, however, that the present permanent members are unwilling to see any new permanent members.

On his visit to India in December 2003, Russian president Vladimir Putin said expanding the Security Council to include more members with the veto power was not a good idea, despite Russia having close ties with India, Japan, Germany and Brazil, which are all aspiring to permanent seats and the veto power.

Advertisement

Last March, British Prime Minister Tony Blair also called for radical reform of the Security Council, saying the organisation was now out of touch with the world’s needs. Canada’s ambassador to the UN backed Blair’s comments, and also called for a shakeup of the Security Council.

In the past three decades or so, many countries have grouped together on the basis of historical, religious or regional ties - for example, the Organisation of Islamic Councils, the European Union, ASEAN, theG-8 and G-20 countries, and so on.

The creation of these groupings is acknowledgement by their members that the UN cannot meet their needs and objectives. Today, platforms like the EU and the OIC are more effective than the UN.

The UN with its present imbalance in favour of the Big Five is nothing more than a meaningless debating platform, producing resolutions that serve only the interests of the superpowers, or that are declared impracticable.

Only when all its members - especially in the Security Council - possess equal power, and every decision and resolution is dealt with democratically, will the UN be effective and forceful.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. Page 4
  6. All

Article edited by Allan Sharp.
If you'd like to be a volunteer editor too, click here.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

10 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Syed Atiq ul Hassan, is senior journalist, writer, media analyst and foreign correspondent for foreign media agencies in Australia. His email is shassan@tribune-intl.com.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Syed Atiq ul Hassan

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 10 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy