Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Separation of powers? Is that a trick question?

By Greg Barns - posted Wednesday, 28 June 2006


The High Court in particular, is now deeply conservative. It is not reflective of the diversity of views that exist in the Australian community. It no longer has among its members, those judges who believe that it is the role of the courts to lead the parliament and the government when justice demands that this be the case.

For example, the decision by the High Court in the Mabo case in 1992 to decide that native title exists in addition to European forms of land title was a prime example of the separation of powers doctrine at work. The High Court was according long overdue justice to Indigenous Australians, and it was for the government and the parliament to figure out a way to ensure that native title became part of Australian law.

It is hard to imagine the current High Court deciding the Mabo case the same way today, which of course is exactly as Mr Howard likes it.

Advertisement

It is not being suggested that Australian democracy is collapsing as a result of the weakening of the separation of powers doctrine. But it is true to say that our democratic tradition is being undermined by the Howard Government’s assaults on the parliament and the courts.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

25 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Greg Barns is National President of the Australian Lawyers Alliance.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Greg Barns

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Greg Barns
Article Tools
Comment 25 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy