Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. HereÔŅĹs how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

States should embrace reform - itís in their interest

By Des Moore - posted Monday, 5 June 2006


Victoria has taken the lead on private-sector infrastructure.

At the Council of Australian Governments (COAG) meeting in February, all state and territory leaders of Labor governments readily reached an almost unprecedented agreement with a Liberal prime minister on a national economic reform agenda designed to improve health and education outcomes, to increase competition in the energy, transport and ports markets and to reduce the regulatory burden on businesses.

So reform is supposedly in the air at all levels of government and the emphasis is on boosting competition.

Advertisement

But first, agreement will need to be reached - presumably at the next COAG meeting - on intergovernmental action plans (IAPs) and the proposed independent body to report annually on progress.

Reforms will improve economic growth and hence government revenues, but who will meet the costs of compensating any losers from reform? Unsurprisingly, states argue federal revenues benefit most, and the February communiqué of COAG indicated a preparedness to consider funding assistance to them once IAPs were developed.

The prospect of a slower growth in state revenues from federal sources also indicates they will seek additional assistance. Initially, the GST was a bonanza for the states, with receipts increasing by 45 per cent - nearly 10 per cent a year - in the first four years to 2004-05.  But projections in the federal budget for 2006-07 are for only a 22 per cent increase in the next four years. With the GST and other federal grants now providing around 45 per cent of total revenues, the states face the prospect of needing markedly to reduce the growth in their recurrent spending.

But governments can, and should, do much reform on their own without waiting for a COAG-driven states-wide agreement. Indeed, it is in their interests to maximise the role of the private sector in the provision of services traditionally regarded as the responsibility of governments.

The line between the private and government sectors has ceased to be clearly defined because governments - and others - are increasingly realising the private sector can provide much of what have hitherto been regarded as public goods.

A deliberative policy of increasing the competitive environment for service provision can be implemented in two ways.

Advertisement

First, by further encouraging the expansion of private sector services that compete directly with government services, or by taking over of the public sector role where that appears likely to improve the efficiency and quality.

For example, since 1997-98 the proportion of students attending fee-charging non-government schools has risen from 28 to 33 per cent, and the million-plus students attending such schools in 2005 effectively save state governments, and thus the taxpayer, about $8 billion a year. A similarly large increase in the proportion of patients treated at fee-charging private hospitals, up from 33 to 39 per cent in 2003-04, is saving over $9 billion a year.

In effect, the higher quality and the wider choice that modern society wants means users of private services are increasingly voting with their feet, even though they have to pay fees as well as taxes. It pays governments to further assist this process both financially and through reduced regulation.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. All

First published in the Australian Financial Review on May 25, 2006.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

18 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Des Moore is Director, Institute for Private Enterprise and a former Deputy Secretary, Treasury. He authored Schooling Victorians, 1992, Institute of Public Affairs as part of the Project Victoria series which contributed to the educational and other reforms instituted by the Kennett Government. The views are his own.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Des Moore

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Des Moore
Article Tools
Comment 18 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy