Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Bad faith drives desire for more competition

By Mark Christensen - posted Thursday, 1 June 2006


Competition, regulation and general cynicism denies such co-dependency is much more valuable than the artificial divisions engendered by competition. Only relationships internal to a vertically-integrated organisation can properly understand and capture more than the sum of the industry parts. Hence the decision to not structurally separate Telstra or direct Fortescue onto BHP’s railway: and why our electricity industry will never be truly efficient.

There are a number of challenging consequences from this. First, no amount of transparency can match Telstra’s integrated commercial assessment of the optimal investment and pricing package for the community. Access negotiations are becoming overly litigious because the mounting claims and counter-claims of who is right can’t be proved either way.

Second, an infrastructure owner, if operating at minimum cost, must always have an advantage over competitors wanting to use its network. Competition should improve network performance to the point where it renders itself ineffective. That is, dominance by an integrated infrastructure provider is a sure sign competition has succeeded.

Advertisement

The government won’t admit this because it would necessitate having faith in Telstra to make needed investments like Fibre To The Node on a monopolistic basis. Instead, ministers continue with the façade, lacking the courage to confront public perceptions that believing the best of business would be at a minimum naïve and at worst reckless.

The government can’t keep having an each-way bet. In deciding to keep Telstra whole, the government effectively confirmed competition inferior to vertical integration. To get the full value of this decision, however, it must also acknowledge the costly impact of the bad faith embedded in competition policy and mandated third party access.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All

First published in the Australian Financial Review on May 26, 2006.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

3 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Mark is a social and political commentator, with a background in economics. He also has an abiding interest in philosophy and theology, and is trying to write a book on the nature of reality. He blogs here.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Mark Christensen

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 3 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy