Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

No neat answers to be found in Israel

By Bren Carlill - posted Friday, 19 May 2006


As such, the idea that the clergy trip was designed to brainwash the participants into a simplistic “Izzies good, Pallies bad” mindset is ridiculous.

The trip was designed to confuse the participants. It was designed to show them that there are countless opinions on the conflict, each with its own merit. It was designed to show them that black and white analyses are usually not based on local knowledge. It was designed to show them that policy decisions and statements by foreign governments and influential people have real impact on the lives of Israelis and Palestinians. It was designed to show them that black and white analysis of this most complicated of conflicts results in more conflict, not less and too often, more needless death.

The trip succeeded. Initial feedback from the participants has a common feature: the realisation by them of the complexity of the conflict. Not one of the clergy has come back preaching the righteousness of Israel’s case. Not one of the inter-church organisations they represent have radically or even at all changed their policies because of the trip. But if the participants approach the conflict with more awareness of the whys and wherefores of what happens in that part of the world, then it will be money well spent.

Advertisement

That is why we sent the clergy. These people influence Australian Christians because of who they are and what they say. If we can make them realise that the conflict has no easy answers, then that realisation will filter through to the people sitting in the pews. The sooner Australians, including those who are anti-Israeli realise that the Arab-Israeli conflict is really, really hard to solve, the sooner the world will find openings toward its resolution.

Ultimately, though, if pro-Palestinian people aren’t happy at that result and if they want Australians to remain ignorant of the conflict’s complexity, let them organise and fund their own trips to the area. Because, unlike the cause they sponsor, Australia promotes free speech and the right of all citizens to engage with our religious and political representatives.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

10 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Bren Carlill worked at the Australia/Israel & Jewish Affairs Council between 2006 and 2011.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Bren Carlill

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 10 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy