Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

When will the music stop?

By Henry Thornton - posted Tuesday, 2 May 2006


The world economy is well into its fourth year of above trend growth. The various global agencies, such as the International Monetary Fund (IMF), are busy raising their forecasts for global growth with strong growth now predicted to continue into 2007.

The prices of oil and of many commodities are setting new records in nominal terms and in some cases also in “real”, i.e. inflation adjusted, terms. Interest rates are rising in most countries, and globally on average.

Global inflation is a major question addressed by the IMF, with extensive analysis that encompasses the late 19th century, arguably an era of relatively free trade and globalisation not unlike present experience. Their analysis is not for the faint-hearted, but is highly recommended for real economists. As Henry reads it, the IMF believes that low global goods and services inflation can persist despite “accommodating” monetary policy and several years of above trend growth.

Advertisement

I must disagree. Global monetary policy has been more than accommodating, positively loose in the case of the US economy where cash rates at 1 per cent were by any standard inflationary. Global goods and services inflation was, however, held down by the extraordinary surge of US productivity - its sources far from fully understood - and the productivity-enhancing entry of China and to a lesser extent India into the global economic mainstream.

With easy money and goods and services inflation constrained by unusually high productivity growth, asset prices have been where the excess money has had its influence. The prices of many commodities, most equities and prime global real estate have boomed.

Australia has shared more than proportionately in the benefits of this process. Both federal and state governments have seen their incomes soar, and so can be generous to voters, especially families in the great suburban heartlands. The Reserve Bank has built a reputation for omnipotence, with US, Chinese and Indian productivity flattering its record as a doughty inflation fighter.

Owners of prime real estate in Australia’s major cities and seasides have grown rich, and competent property developers are revered as Australia’s best and brightest businessmen. Well run corporations have prospered, and their bosses have grown rich with the benefits from generous share schemes. Superannuation funds have prospered as share prices regularly hit new records. Smart investors who went “long” resource stocks are especially happy and if they also own a lot of real estate they light candles (or they should) in the cathedrals to Messrs Howard, Costello and Macfarlane.

The losers include the Federal Labor Party opposition, unskilled workers - who feel the competition from China and India most directly, the union bosses - whose constituency has evaporated before their eyes, incompetent businessmen and those who are squeezed out of the great prosperity-building game by lack of education, lack of initiative or lack of opportunity. This is a brutal Darwinian process, but it helps ensure that domestic productivity continues to grow, keeping a prosperous Australia well up in the global economic contest.

Can this great game go on? When will the music stop?

Advertisement

The great burst of globalisation in the late 19th and early 20th centuries was ended by brutal conflict. The first war on a global sale was followed by global depression and then by a second global war - scholars have convincingly traced the many links from the first Great War to the great depression and to the second Great War. The restrictions and controls applied during and after this half century of war and depression took many years to unwind.

The wars then were a manifestation of competition between two great empires. Now we see a number of worrying developments, collectively likely to slow, and possibly to reverse, the growth of global prosperity. There is global conflict between the prosperous west and the fanatical parts of the Islamic nations. There is the battle to save the environment, and to overcome growing disparities between rich and poor.

We cannot ignore the more narrowly economically-based battles either - with their symptoms the “imbalances” so emphasised by agencies such as the IMF. China has a vast and still growing current account surplus, while the United States has a vast and still growing current account deficit.

Australia is firmly in the US camp in both geo-political and economic terms, with an unsustainable current account deficit despite the benefits for us of the world’s greatest commodities boom.

It is fashionable, especially it seems in Canberra, to believe these imbalances do not matter. They reflect, it is said, the decisions of consenting adults in the private sector to spend more than they earn: all will be well since the government is saving more than it spends. But, as the global gurus of the IMF point out, adjusting to imbalances is often chaotic and damaging and, in the case of China and the US, the damaging chaos could include very damaging trade embargoes as the US cuts it’s spending and its unbalanced trade with China.

House prices have risen faster in Australia than in most countries. This has occurred with the help of accommodating tax law and has been buttressed by a vast expansion of household debt. The debt burden has stayed the Reserve Bank’s naturally propensity to limit the size of the asset boom, and now limits its ability to lean into all the imbalances for fear of precipitating an unnecessary recession.

The imbalance of most direct interest to the Reserve is inflation. Here the graph tells the story. Unusually low global inflation has begun to rise. The rise of export prices is well understood, influenced as it is by the commodity prices that have raised our individual and collective incomes so much. Far more worrying is the rise of import price inflation. And then there is the rise of goods and services inflation.

The CPI rose by 0.9 per cent in the March quarter, slightly above the market consensus of 0.8 per cent. The headline inflation rate rose to 3.0 per cent from 2.8 per cent in Q4. More importantly for the monetary-policy outlook, the RBA's measures of “core inflation” suggest acceleration in trend inflation, after a period of remarkable stability near 2.5 per cent. These measures do not yet reflect record oil prices in April or the continuing impact of the global commodity boom.

The Reserve is on the horns of a dilemma it cannot avoid. It should do its bit to minimise the imbalances but with the build-up of household debt it is wary of the impact of policy tightening. Soon it will have no choice but to act and then we shall find out just how fragile is our current prosperity.


Source: RBA and ASB

Addendum to version published in The Australian

Monetary policy is not the main game at present, nor do I believe it will be greatly influenced by the Federal budget.

This month I have deliberately focused on the main game which is the state of the global economy. Continuing strong growth and the legacy of easy money is sure eventually to produce what I call "goods and services inflation", having already produced dangerous levels of asset inflation.

It would have been better if Australia had tightened its monetary policy sooner and by more, as I have argued consistently during this massive asset boom. (And we could also have argued in relevant economic fora - and perhaps we did - for tighter global monetary policy.) "Better late than never" remains my view about local monetary policy, but there are many tactical issues for the RBA to consider, not least the May budget, not wanting to rock the boat ahead of the appointment of the next RBA governor and the usual uncertainties about the actual economic trajectory.

I see a rate hike this month finely balanced on tactical grounds, although there are so many stories from "well connected" journalists and financial sector economists that I am tempted to say "the fix is on".

I leave this sort of prediction to those with more vivid imaginations than Henry, or a far greater ability to listen at drainpipes or to learn in cosy boardroom chats. Instead this month I focus on geopolitical risks - the war on terror - plus what I might call "geo-economic" risks - the deteriorating environment and the growing disparity of wealth and incomes both within countries and between nations: this development feeding the geopolitical tensions in obvious ways. There are also the obvious economic "imbalances" so beloved of serious analysts, the US (and Australian) current account deficits, China's burgeoning current account surpluses, over-stimulated asset markets and surging commodity prices.

Taken together, these big issues have a high chance of bringing the current global boom to a juddering halt.

That is the big economic issue we face, and to maximise our chances of coping in good shape we need to become far more competitive than we are at present. The current IR reforms are, I believe, biting far harder than currently discussed and this will be helpful. The start of serious tax reform argued for in this column last month would also be very helpful. IR and tax reform are the two big reforms that could help Australia to maintain its "miracle economy" status through the virtually inevitable global economic downturn.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. All

First published today in The Australian on May 2, 2006.with heading "The global prosperity game; it'll end in tears" and on Henry Thornton's website.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

16 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Henry Thornton (1760-1815) was a banker, M.P., Philanthropist, and a leading figure in the influential group of Evangelicals that was known as the Clapham set. His column is provided by the writers at www.henrythornton.com.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Henry Thornton

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Henry Thornton
Article Tools
Comment 16 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy