Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Homing in on private property

By Graham Ring - posted Monday, 13 March 2006


Professor Mick Dodson is buying a house. That well-balanced journal The Australian exposed this scandal as long ago as September last year, but still no action has been taken. As I understand it, Dodson has brazenly confirmed his guilt. Yet there is no Royal Commission, no parliamentary inquiry - not even a cringing public apology.

Clearly this is not good enough, so the National Indigenous Times has applied its considerable resources to ferreting out the truth - however unpalatable. In the public interest, our “spy in the sky” satellite has made several low passes over the Dodson bunker in recent times.

We now have disturbing footage of a bloke who looks very much like Mick Dodson - well it's only the top of a black bush hat, but we think it's him - going to the supermarket, digging in the garden, and taking the dog for a walk.

Advertisement

We believe that these activities also warrant close examination, and that the public is entitled to some kind of explanation.

What I propose is “Dodson-cam”, a 24-7, on-line monitoring of the man's every activity. That way anyone with a casual interest in his private affairs can simply log in and see what's going on.

If he's got nothing to hide then there's no problem, right?

Sure, the bleeding heart liberals will squeal for a little while about “invasion of privacy” and the like, but we need much greater accountability and transparency in this country. The public has a right to know. I've made a detailed search of the criminal statutes, and I can't actually find the bit that says buying a house is a crime, but I'm sure that it's in there somewhere.

Nevertheless, the “house-purchase shock, horror, outrage, scandal” demands some immediate answers. So I've been doing a bit of digging around, and it seems that things are much worse than I could have imagined. The insidious practice of house-purchase is rife.

In fact, I have unconfirmed advice that several people directly employed by a major national broadsheet are themselves buying houses.

Advertisement

Appalled at this development, I decided to cast the net a little wider, to try and establish just how widespread this unscrupulous behaviour has become. I regret to inform you, gentle reader, that every second person I meet seems to be buying a house. Hell, I'm buying one myself. My - admittedly feeble - defence is that I hadn't realised till now what a serious offence this was.

However, I've seen enough cop shows to know that “ignorance is no excuse”, so I'm prepared to take my lumps in the interests of preserving the fabric of our society.

But I can't help noticing that The Oz is unable to summon up the same level of indignation about all these other flagrant house-purchasers.

What's so special about Mick Dodson? Perhaps the chance to run a lurid headline like “Man buys house” was just too much for The Oz to resist. Or did they get niggly because a highly-respected Indigenous leader had the temerity to make statements at odds with The Oz editorial line?

You see, Professor Dodson had some thoughtful things to say about the problematic notion of private property ownership on communal land. Aboriginal leaders do tend to make public comment about matters of crucial importance to Indigenous Australians. This isn't illegal either.

Oxfam reports that it costs $225,000 to build the most basic of houses in a remote community, where conditions are harsh and buildings deteriorate rapidly. Meanwhile, the average monthly household income in very remote areas of the Northern Territory is less than $3,500 - between four adults.

Existing houses are invariably over-crowded, with ten or more people sometimes sharing a house designed for half that number. Put it down to a lack of housing stock - and the curious tendency of most Indigenous Australians to share whatever they have with a wide circle of family and friends.

All in all, when in comes to the question of “own-your-owns” on communal land, it's not hard to see why caution should be the order of the day.

Perhaps Dodson assumed that most Australians could distinguish between the circumstances of a skilled professional living in a major city, and a bushman with a far less marketable set of skills living a semi-traditional existence in a remote community.

I reckon he was right.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. All

Article edited by Melanie Olding.
If you'd like to be a volunteer editor too, click here.

First published in Issue 98 of the National Indigenous Times, Feb 2006.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

5 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Graham Ring is an award-winning writer and a fortnightly National Indigenous Times columnist. He is based in Alice Springs.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Graham Ring

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Graham Ring
Article Tools
Comment 5 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy