Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Privatising Australia's water

By Selwyn Johnston - posted Thursday, 9 February 2006


For the regulators, however, it creates a need for greater co-ordination of policies and information sharing. Without adequate regulation, there are three possible outcomes:

  • excessively high prices;
  • poor service; or
  • both

Australian governments will need to get the regulatory structures right before they fully privatise, and this may take time.

Advertisement

At the moment, by contrast, Australian states have full control over their water systems and the structure is much simpler. This means Australia has two advantages over Britain:

  • ownership structures are simpler: and
  • Australia can learn from Britain’s mistakes.

Water and the United Nations

The United Nations (Water) hosted a three-day conference in Paris, during March 1998, on managing the world's limited fresh water supplies. According to the British BBC and the United States Boston Sunday Globe, environment ministers and officials attended this conference from 84 countries. It was agreed that water should be paid for as a commodity rather than be treated as an essential staple to be supplied free.

French President, Jacques Chirac, told delegates "no more barren wrangling over the market versus the state. Water has a price and zero price is a forewarning of scarcity."

Chirac (who chaired the conference) estimated that it would cost $400 billion to set up reliable water networks around the world and told participants that governments could not foot the bill alone. The proposed solution was to market water as a prime opportunity for multinational investors.

As John Bastin of the European Bank of Reconstruction and Development has said, "Water is the last infrastructure frontier for private investors".

Advertisement

Australia’s taxpayers must now pay the price of our politicians’ folly and their eagerness to support International Treaties.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. All

For more information on water, click here.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

25 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Selwyn Johnston is an independent candiate for the federal seat of Leichhardt in far North Queensland for 2007.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Selwyn Johnston

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Selwyn Johnston
Article Tools
Comment 25 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy