Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Iran and the fairy tale of international law

By James McConvill - posted Tuesday, 7 February 2006


International law is a failed system of law by rule, an initiative that has contributed to anarchy which characterises foreign affairs. Indeed, it is far too generous to give international law the label of “law”. In practice, international law is nothing more than a convoluted form of politics.

As Professor Mirko Bagaric writes in his book, Critical Perspectives of International Law (2006): “International law is value laden and highly politicised. In fact it can be tenably argued that it is more about politics than law.”

Even if we were to be generous and characterise international law as law, rather than just politics with a nice tie, international law would not be saved. International law is grossly inefficient. These days, the hard rules of international law are rarely complied with or enforced, despite tonnes of money thrown at the system to keep these rules in place. The cost exceeds the benefit - if there is a benefit.

Advertisement

There is no formal alternative to international law. Nor can international law be fixed. It is time to call a spade a spade, and start again. In starting again, it is important that we realise that “international” and “law” do not fit together. You cannot have efficient and effective international rules. The force of domestic politics is just too strong. You also cannot have efficient and effective international organisations (leaving aside corporations). The UN is a case in point.

International peace and security will always come second fiddle to domestic political considerations. While at times this may not be the most desirable situation, it is reality. As philosopher John Ralston Saul argues in his recent book, The Collapse of Globalism and the Reinvention of the World (2005): ‘Many people may want to have an international side to their lives, but they want to live in their communities.’

Any effort to try and change this involves buying into a fairy tale. Only the cost is much, much higher than the cover price of Harry Potter.

Iran may one day face sanctions or military strike. Iran may blow up Israel, or the entire world. Whatever happens, international law will play no role.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

33 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

James McConvill is a Melbourne lawyer. The opinions expressed are his personal views only, and were written in the
spirit of academic freedom when James was employed as a university lecturer.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by James McConvill

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of James McConvill
Article Tools
Comment 33 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy