Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. HereÔŅĹs how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

The ever-increasing spotlight on Assadís Baathist regime

By Bashdar Ismaeel - posted Thursday, 19 January 2006


With the ubiquitous global terrorist threat and in the aftermath of the September 11 attacks, one of the countries placed directly in the spotlight is Syria. This spotlight was magnified further in recent weeks by a new UN resolution designed to further pressure the government by calling for an independent inquiry into the alleged assassination of the popular anti-Syrian former Lebanese prime minister Rafik Hariri.

Long present on the infamous axis-of-evil, Syria’s policies and authoritarian grip on society were perhaps only over-shadowed by the now ousted regime of Saddam Hussein. Such dictatorial grip and lack of democratic freedoms are perhaps reasons enough for reforms and change, but new events have provided even more ammunition.

Alleged cross-border Syrian support for insurgents in Iraq, the aforementioned assassination of Hariri and general hostility towards the US and Israel has propelled its status as the next country on the radar for greater Middle Eastern change under US hegemony. This has placed Syria into a difficult position, with the might of the US military on its right and the ever-present Israeli threat on its left.

Advertisement

Perhaps, along with events in Iraq propelling Iraqi Kurds to greater prominence and recognition, another crucial factor and potential pawn on the US chessboard is the long forgotten and disenfranchised Syrian Kurdish population. A population who seemingly has acquired new found confidence and inspiration to demand greater recognition and change, without fear of government reprisals, common in the past. This has pushed the 2.5 million or so Kurds, many of whom are stateless and deprived of common state services, into the foreground. Increased coverage of Syrian Kurdish issues appear to tie in nicely with US views on Syria and provides a potential wildcard.

The threat of opposition domestically has often been lacking, or never materialised, as Syria’s diverse but apparently fractious opposition has often bickered and posed no real threat to the autocratic power grip of the Arab nationalist Baath Party. Yet with the ever-growing isolation of Syria in the international arena and with the threat of military actions and economic sanctions, the opposition parties have found a new lease of life.

The new impetuous to unite and propose a more effective message to the government recently resulted in the signing of the Damascus Declaration by a dozen or so groups; it has been put together to further pressure Bashar al-Assad's regime for political reforms and a new, more encompassing and liberalised constitution. The government has long attempted to drive a wedge between Syrian Kurdish and Arab opposition parties using the Arab nationalistic wildcard and the image of Kurds as separatists. However, the new-found prominence of the Kurds in the region means that the carrot-and-stick approach to the Syrian Kurdish question may no longer work.

The long impoverished Syrian Kurdish area, predominantly in North-Eastern Syria, has recently witnessed well-documented uprisings and ethnic violence and pro-US demonstrations, bringing their plight to the international media.

Promised economic and political reforms since Bashar al-Assad's sudden rise to power in 2000 - as a result of his father’s death - have never materialised in reality. Some 300,000 stateless Kurds classified as foreigners still exist with no access to state health, education or facilities and unable to travel. The recent Baath Party congress promised to resolve this situation along with loosening of the political noose around non-Baathist parties.

Modern Syria gained its independence from France in 1946 but has lived through periods of political instability due largely to the conflicting interests of its various groups.

Advertisement

Since then, Syria’s political position has been colourful, to say the least, resulting in periods of political instability, due largely to varying interests in its political and social spectrum. Its political stance has led to many years of neo-military occupation in Lebanon, from where it only recently pulled out its forces under intense international pressure,  after the assassination of Hariri. Such events, coupled with its historic bitterness towards Israel and its support and harbouring of Islamic militant groups, have resulted in sporadic conflicts between the two nations.

However, Syria now only needs to look across its shoulder at the new democratic and liberal Iraq which undertook its third elections in December alone. the Syrian government's ability to counter power by force, intimidation and trepidation may now backfire as its diverse community may now no longer fear a backlash to demands for greater change and a say on Syria's destiny.

The UN resolution on Syria, although primarily focused on the need for an internal inquiry into the death of Hariri, was also a veiled threat of not only economic sanctions but “further action” if co-operation was not undertaken. These could also concern, perhaps, taking firmer action on insurgents in Syria and introducing political reforms.

With its hands tied by Afghanistan and especially across the border in Iraq, presumably the US is not in a position to dictate regime change. A general change of mindset and behaviour is advocated. This does not mean the US would not welcome regime change. With heightened international pressure and the new-found unity of Syrian opposition groups, the US may have more than a great military arsenal in its quest to oust the current regime.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. All

First published in the Hewler Globe (pdf file 265KB) on January 3, 2006.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

5 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Bashdar Pusho Ismaeel is a London-based freelance writer and analyst, whose primary focus and expertise is on the Kurds, Iraq and Middle Eastern current affairs. The main focus of his writing is to promote peace, justice and increase awareness of the diversity, suffering and at times explosive mix in Iraq and the Middle East.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Bashdar Ismaeel

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Bashdar Ismaeel
Article Tools
Comment 5 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy