Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Shades of the nanny state in Nelson's drive to implement VSU

By Alex Collins and Krystian Seibert - posted Friday, 20 January 2006


The passing of voluntary student unionism (VSU) legislation by the Senate is sure to please the many members of the Liberal Party room who developed a passionate hatred for student unions while fighting for control of them in the 1970 and 1980s.

While Labor Leader Kim Beazley and renegade National Party Senator Barnaby Joyce have evoked colourful language criticising the bill, what is truly unfortunate is that a hatred of unions seems to have driven Federal Education Minister Brendan Nelson to implement a policy that contradicts liberal ideology. This ideology is the right of individuals and businesses to make their own decisions free from government interference. While students will no longer be forced to join student unions, the only voluntary aspect to the legislation is in the rather deceptively named title.

The policy makes it illegal for both student unions and universities to charge up-front mandatory fees for the provision and support of student services such as counselling or sporting facilities, the logic being that if students value such services, then they will be willing to pay for them on an individual basis. However, for a party that traditionally prides itself on a belief in the power and right of individuals and businesses to make their own choices, the Liberal Party has effectively imposed its will on Australian universities.

Advertisement

The decision implies two things. First, that the Federal Government only trusts itself when it comes to making decisions about the provision of higher education in Australia. It obviously doesn't trust our universities. If that were the case, then it would permit universities to make their own decisions as to what fees to charge (if any) and how they will be charged (either through a combination of deferred tuition fees and up-front student services fees or through a single all-inclusive fee). It would also allow universities to make their own decisions as to how they provide student services (either through universal provision for all students or through a user- pays system).

Second, it implies that the Federal Government has little faith in the potential for competition to ensure efficient and fair outcomes in our society and specifically in this case to drive enhancements in the provision of non-academic university facilities and programs.

When students select a university to attend, there are several factors that they consider: entrance requirements and the relative quality and the cost of their preferred course must all be weighed up. The level of mandatory fees is also a consideration. Consequently, given that universities compete with one another for students, their ability to charge high mandatory fees is quite limited because if the fees are too high, students will simply elect to attend other universities whose mandatory fees are lower. These competitive pressures provide an incentive for universities to charge lower mandatory fees and to be efficient in how those funds are spent.

The Federal Government's financial adjustment package will provide some assistance in the short-term, but it is obviously not sustainable in the long-term.

We are acutely aware that student unions are far from perfect. They can be wasteful, and due to student apathy at Australian universities, they are rarely held to proper account through student elections. (At the last Melbourne University Student Union elections, fewer than 10 per cent of students even bothered to vote.) Sadly this means student unions tend to be dominated by the extremities of both sides of politics.

No student should be forced to join a student union or to pay for political activity by student unions. At the same time, other than perhaps capping the level of up front mandatory fees to ensure that there is no substantial financial burden on students, the Government shouldn't be dictating to Australian universities as to how they deliver their student services or what structure they use to fund them.

Advertisement

As players in the internationally competitive tertiary education market, Australian universities need to be able to make their own management decisions with minimal government interference. Australian universities don't need a nanny state to tell them what to do, they need the freedom to make their own decisions as to how they provide quality student services, so that students who need them can access them.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. All

Article edited by Hudson Birden.
If you'd like to be a volunteer editor too, click here.

First published in The Canberra Times on December 16, 2005.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

14 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Authors

Alex Collins is a student of law and commerce. He is a member of the Australian Liberal Party.

Krystian Seibert is a public policy professional based in Melbourne. He has worked as a policy adviser to two Australian Ministers and studied regulatory policy at the London School of Economics.

Other articles by these Authors

All articles by Alex Collins
All articles by Krystian Seibert

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Alex CollinsAlex CollinsPhoto of Krystian SeibertKrystian Seibert
Article Tools
Comment 14 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy