Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

The art of censorship

By Christopher van Opstal - posted Wednesday, 28 December 2005


But censorship on campus is not just imposed by an external hand: some student publications are at the mercy of their own student government. According to National Union of Students president Felix Eldridge, student newspapers "are not set up to represent the views of student organisations, but to represent the views of students". Student newspapers, he says, are often partly - if not entirely - reliant on funding from student bodies, which sometimes misuse their power by putting political pressure on editors.

Earlier this year, the Liberal-dominated University of New England Students Association froze all funds to the student magazine Neucleus. Its editor, Seren Trump, had refused to hand over editorial control to UNESA's president to harden the association's pro-voluntary student unionism position.

"A lot of students on campus are anti-VSU and there's been a lot of material coming into Neucleus that is critical of VSU," says former UNE director of student media Brian Hail. “If the president or executive have the power to vet Neucleus, they could also vet criticisms of VSU."

Advertisement

For students at the private Notre Dame University, the university’s Catholic hierarchy managed a good showing of its religious glorification by tabooing topics from “abortion, contraception and gay unions,” says Quasimodo editor Chris Bailey. “Censorship has been extended to include most sexual references, profane language and even criticism of the university.”

The university elected a review committee, comprised of members of the university and the students’ association, to check each edition and curb any outbreaks of religious protest. Evaluation procedures are enshrined in the Constitution of the Students Association, though not specifying what material may be excluded. “The Quasimodo now is very much G-rated,” says Bailey, leading him to dub the group of interventionists the “Censorship Committee”.

Editors considered it a distasteful lesson when the vice-chancellor ordered an immediate ban on the magazine after an article on the morning-after pill became the subject of discussion. No further actions were taken, but Bailey and his team were “unofficially told by university staff that students involved in defying the university may be kicked out of uni”.

John Bransgrove is an outspoken critic of student rights at Macquarie University and believes a “student government works like any government”. By this he means that “if Macquarie were a f---ing country, a revolution would take place”.

The conservative Macquarie University Students Council (MUSC) pulled the plug on Macquarie’s student paper, Muscateer, to further the political ambitions of President, Victor Ma. Since elections were unconstitutionally suspended last year, Ma allegedly planted one or two of his confidants into the editorial team. During his reign of two years, only a single edition of Muscateer appeared on shelves.

I think it’s disappointing that the university is deprived of a student newspaper out of the control of internal parties,” says Matt Christensen, a former Muscateer editor. He and four associate editors settled on producing a second issue, but the verdict of other two remaining editors, along with the blessing of Ma, was odd enough reason to ditch the magazine. Ma declined to comment on the matter.

Advertisement

Some student publications may push the boundaries too far on occasion, but these incidents nevertheless raise questions about the right to dissent. “If I was a liberal democrat, I would of course believe that the law should apply to anyone. But I’m not!” says Boey. “I don’t think the legal system should play any role in censoring people’s views, especially students”.

Duncan, this year's editor of the UNSW paper Tharunka, says the Rabelais episode still resonates. "The Rabelais scandal is dusted off and paraded around as justification for student press censorship every time controversial content is being negotiated," she says.

The VSU issue has drawn fire from student newspapers across the country and is perhaps the greatest threat to freedom of speech and thought among students. Many young editors now fear that censorship will lead to silence as funds dry up by July next year.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All

Article edited by Natalie Rose.
If you'd like to be a volunteer editor too, click here.

An edited version of this article was first published in The Australian on November 14, 2005.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

28 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Christopher van Opstal is a student of journalism and law at the University of Technology, Sydney.

Related Links
Rabelais judgment

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 28 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy