Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

The hanging of Ray Williams - Part 1

By Dave Smith - posted Monday, 8 August 2005


My favourite old philosophical adage holds true of course: ten leaking buckets hold exactly the same amount of water as one leaking bucket (i.e. no water at all). Even so, the multi-bucket approach carries a certain emotive force and given that these characters needed to justify the amount of public money that had been spent on pursuing Ray, this also made it appear as if they’d been earning their fat salaries.

Ray had gone silent. I prodded him again, “So, what’s the problem? They’ve offered to drop most of the charges in return for finding you guilty on a couple of little ones. It sounds to me like they’ve recognised they haven’t really got much against you. That’s a good thing, isn’t it?”

“Yes,” said Ray. “But the problem is…these things they want me to plead guilty to…I didn’t do them!”

Advertisement

Ah! So there’s the rub!

Ray went on to explain, “If the charges were simply that I’d been negligent or had overlooked something I shouldn’t have overlooked, I think I could live with that. But these charges say I deliberately misled people and that I knowingly withheld information and David … I didn’t! If I had known some of these things, there’s no way I would have held back the information. I didn’t know these things! But now they’re telling me that unless I confess to the charges, I will go to jail!”

The overall picture was pretty ugly. Allow me to summarise. What was put to Ray was if he confessed to the three little crimes, the whole legal inquisition would be over by Christmas and he would probably not have to spend any time in jail. Conversely, he was told in no uncertain terms that if he did not confess to the three little crimes, the legal team would pursue him with everything they had and the case would drag on for another two to three years. It would cost him between $2-$3 million more in legal fees and he would certainly end up in jail at the end of it all.

Now, I’m not privy to Ray’s personal financial affairs, but I do know he lost everything when HIH collapsed. There was no way he could afford to fight the legal battle for another two or three years. Even if he did have the financial resources, I wonder if he could have lasted emotionally. They seemed to have him over a barrel, but Ray couldn’t bring himself to accept the inevitable conclusion. I didn’t want to accept it either.

“Now is not the time to sell your soul, is it Ray?” I said.

“No,” he said. “And I know I couldn’t carry through with it anyway. Even if I did sign something now, saying I confessed to these things, I’d get up before the court and somebody would look me in the eye and ask, ‘Did you deliberately withhold this information?’ And I’d break down. I’d say, ‘No, I didn’t’. I wouldn’t be able to carry it through. I’ve got to keep fighting. But how can I?”

Advertisement

Apparently one senior legal guy had said to Ray, “Look mate, I’d confess to raping my own mother if it would keep me out of jail”. Ray had been unimpressed, but he was in a dilemma.

This is the way our legal system works. I've seen it operate like this before, grinding good people down until they can't fight any more. Truth is not the issue. Neither is guilt or innocence. It's a war between two parties and Ray was on the wrong side of the government and the media and was a scapegoat to assuage the public thirst for vengeance. What hope did he have?

The decision

Ray reappeared exactly one week later. This in itself was no surprise. Every Tuesday the staff and volunteers of the church have lunch together and Ray would often join us. What surprised me was what he said to me as soon as lunch was over, “Dave, I’m going to take the guilty plea”.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. All

Article edited by Angela Sassone.
If you'd like to be a volunteer editor too, click here.

First published on Father Dave's website in four parts.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Father Dave Smith is Parish Priest, professional boxer, human-rights activist and father of four. He was part of the Mussalaha (reconciliation) delegation to Syria in May 2013. Join Dave's mailing list via his main website - www.fatherdave.org - and read his updates on Syria on www.prayersforsyria.com.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Dave Smith
Related Links
On Line Opinion - The hanging of Ray Williams - Part 2
On Line Opinion - The hanging of Ray Williams - Part 3

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment Comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy