Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Absence of ethics in the public service

By Noel Preston - posted Thursday, 21 July 2005


Meanwhile, the very term "public service" is losing credibility. The notion of "public service" is indisputably value laden, just as public administration is fundamentally an ethical enterprise. The public interest and the common good are jeopardised when public officials fail to understand the ethical implications of their actions, even though they are technically competent or strategically astute.

To offset this possibility we must revise our conception of public office which, in my view, is best understood not as a career or even a profession, but as a vocation. Perhaps this suggestion jars in a cynical public or among bureaucrats hardened by the hothouse of government in daily practice.

"Vocation" literally means "calling" and is often linked to religious traditions, although it is comfortably applied to other caring professions, such as nursing. It involves adopting an appropriate discipline which links one's work with a mission. Public office, in its various guises, is surely a noble pursuit with a clear mission to pursue the well-being of all citizens.

Advertisement

Idealistic though it may sound, when public office is understood vocationally, the groundwork is laid for integrity in government, for that perspective is likely to fortify a bureaucrat's capacity to be an official conscience, one who relates frankly and fearlessly to superiors. Moreover, public administrators with a sense of vocation ask constantly and collegially whether their actions are consistent with the core purposes of their role.

As one of the great bureaucrats of the 20th century, former secretary-general of the United Nations Dag Hammarsjold, once said: "Only they deserve power who justify its use daily."

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All

First published in The Courier-Mail on July 18, 2005.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

15 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Dr Noel Preston is Adjunct Professor in the Griffith University Key Centre for Ethics, Law, Justice and Governance. He is the author of Understanding Ethics (20O1, Federation Press, Sydney), and several texts on public sector ethics. His web page can be found here.

Noel Preston’s recent book is Beyond the Boundary: a memoir exploring ethics, politics and spirituality (Zeus Publications).

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Noel Preston

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Noel Preston
Article Tools
Comment 15 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Latest from QUT
 The science of reporting climate change
 Why schools need more than a business plan
 Suburban resilience
 Science unlimited
 Wake-up call for science
 More...
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy