Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Group and self-interests coalesce

By Nicholas Gruen - posted Thursday, 30 June 2005


All around the country, people argue about whether we’re better off if the focus is on “self-interest” or on “the community” - where people look out for each other.

Let me tell you something about really successful social and economic systems. They’re always a mix of the two. Dotted throughout our market system - which encourages people to pursue their own self interest - are systems in which groups pursue group interests.

First there’s the social and cultural ground within which markets grow. People in modern societies are essentially peaceable. They have to be to do business with each other. But there’s a huge system of government and law which keeps them that way. Of course some rogues rip people off. But we catch enough and punish enough so that if you were planning a good life for yourself, you wouldn't be too unscrupulous in your dealings. Ask Rodney Adler or the late Rene Rivkin and Christopher Skase and his less-late-wife Pixie who seems to have finally wangled her way out of exile.

Advertisement

And if you work for a firm, it’s a kind of collective too. You might get bonuses for doing a good job, but chances are you identify with your firm and its fortunes as strongly (well nearly as strongly) as the denizens of Brisbane support the Maroons or the Brisbane Lions.

So long as people can behave collectively in the right context - within firms, within families and in administering the rule of law, as Adam Smith argued centuries ago, self interest and community interests coalesce in a miraculous way. Smith is famous for saying in The Wealth of Nations that in securing our dinner “We address ourselves”, not to the humanity of the butcher and the baker “but to their self-love”.

But his less well-known earlier book, The Theory of Moral Sentiments, explored the importance of sentimental attachments, of people to one another, within families, and communities and nations. That was the great backdrop in which the market’s miraculous “invisible hand” could work.

The closest real world example of the rule of pure self-interest is in the anarchy of the third world’s failed states - not our own commercial societies.

And two miraculous new forms of production have come into their own lately. And guess what? Each is a new play between selfishness and regard for others.

The first is “micro-credit”. Throughout the developed world millions need only the smallest break to work their way out of poverty and oppression. The first micro-credit loan was US$27 to help African women make bamboo furniture.

Advertisement

The lender was Muhammad Yunus who founded the Grameen Bank. It lends these small amounts to groups of people - particularly women - who all go co-guarantor. People might walk away from a loan to themselves, but these “solidarity groups” radiate not just financial pain but also the social shame of default.

It turns out that “solidarity groups’” default rate is way below our credit card default rates. Group and self-interest coalesce a deft and miraculous new combination.

The other new economic form is Open Source Software.

You might have heard of Linux - now Microsoft’s main threat. Linux “kind of” writes itself. How? First; start with some software that is written and then released to others. As other programmers use it, they enhance the code, often to meet their own needs.

Hacker Richard Stallman was incensed at the ease with which such software could be effectively “privatised”. Private firms could enhance publicly available software and then on-sell the product as private software.

Stallman developed “copyleft” - a special copyright licence. Copylefted or “open sourced” software gives anyone to whom it is distributed the right to amend it and to further distribute it to others, but only on condition that any subsequent distribution is subject to the same condition. Get it? This effectively creates a chain of programmers each using and, if they wish, enhancing software. But - and this is the key - it's difficult to benefit from keeping your enhancements secret.

But why would anyone develop the software if they couldn’t make it theirs? As the hacker slogan goes, “give a little, take a lot”. Programmers get the software for nothing. And if they enhance it they had an incentive to donate their work back to the open source community. Why? Because they can’t sell their handiwork without the buyers asserting their right to distribute it themselves. On the other hand, if they share the enhancement it can be incorporated into subsequent releases of the software.

And when the Internet threw off the shackles of geography, thousands of hackers could contribute. Software that “kind of” builds itself! Now the biggest computer companies around - think IBM, Novell, Hewlett Packard - are joining in out of the goodness of their selfish little hearts. They’ve bought into the open source movement distributing and developing software. Why? Because they don’t want to give their rival Microsoft a hand up. Oh, and it helps them meet their customers’ needs better. So they get to sell more of their hardware and consulting services.

Yet another case of one for one, and one for all.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

2 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Dr Nicholas Gruen is CEO of Lateral Economics and Chairman of Peach Refund Mortgage Broker. He is working on a book entitled Reimagining Economic Reform.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Nicholas Gruen

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Nicholas Gruen
Article Tools
Comment 2 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy