Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Slugs and snails and puppy dogs' tails

By John Ridd - posted Wednesday, 20 April 2005


One possibility is that the relatively good male performance in maths and physical science may be, at least in part, due to the assessment procedures in Queensland. It would appear that they have not (yet?) reached the stage described in a submission to the parliamentary inquiry Boys: getting it right.

Referring to the literacy expectations in maths assessment in South Australia the comment was made that:

The level of nomenclature and sophisticated verbal reasoning skills that are required - to even understand what the problem is - is on average four times greater than what is required in Australian history and English literature.

Advertisement

An unbelievable state of affairs surely for a maths course? Unfortunately not, it is merely a reflection of the establishments domination of State Boards of Study and hence of their assessment systems.

The interests of the disciplines of maths and science appear to chime with the interests of boys, particularly boys from poorer backgrounds in terms of assessment. All authorities that are charged with the responsibility fairly to assess student performance need to ensure that in all existing and particularly in new syllabuses the assessment systems conform to a recommendation from the parliamentary enquiry.

Assessment procedures for maths and sciences must, as a first requirement, provide information about students' knowledge, skills and achievement on the subject, and not be a de facto examination of students' English comprehension and expression.

Pretty obvious you would think. But doesn't the fact that such statements need to be made show the depth of utter rubbish that has been reached.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. Page 4
  6. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

2 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

John Ridd taught and lectured in maths and physics in UK, Nigeria and Queensland. He co-authored a series of maths textbooks and after retirement worked for and was awarded a PhD, the topic being 'participation in rigorous maths and science.'

Other articles by this Author

All articles by John Ridd

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of John Ridd
Article Tools
Comment 2 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy