Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Time for a commonsense detention policy

By Tim Martyn - posted Monday, 4 April 2005


In 1998 the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission developed a more effective community model for assessing and detaining asylum seekers, contained within the report "Those who’ve come across the seas: detention of unauthorised arrivals".This model was developed further in 2001 by the Conference of Leaders of Religious Institutes (NSW) and another non-governmental organisation, Justice for Asylum Seekers.

The model entails:

  1. A period of initial mandatory detention to ensure public health and safety and identification, but only for a limited period of 30 days with two possible extensions of 30 days.
  2. Detentions over the 30 days period should only be allowed in cases where:
    - identity cannot be verified;
    - there are reasonable grounds of a threat to national security, public order, health or safety;
    - a person seems likely to abscond;
    - a person refuses to undertake health screening; or
    - a person has not lodged an application for a Protection Visa.
    Those given priority for release are children, the elderly, single women and those requiring medical or trauma attention. The decision on release should be made by departmental officers subject to tribunal and judicial review, or by an assessment panel with both departmental and outside members.
  3. Those not denied release on one of the above criteria are given a community release, bridging visa (allowing the visa holder to reside at an approved address as long as he/she reports to the Department at regular intervals. A bond payment may be required of family or sponsors.
  4. Asylum seekers who breach the conditions set for release may be returned to detention for another 30 days and reassessment.
  5. Any asylum seeker detained beyond the initial period of 30 days may seek review of the decision to continue detention.
Advertisement

The asylum seeker “crisis” has passed. The “flood” has dried up. It is no longer necessary to “deter” potential asylum seekers by detaining those who’ve already arrived for periods of up to six years. The time has come to mothball the remaining Immigration Reception Processing Centres and shift the remaining asylum seekers into community accommodation.

Let common sense reign. Ending ongoing mandatory detention in favour of the above assessment model represents a more compassionate, cost effective and reliable policy for processing asylum seekers in Australia.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

116 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Tim Martyn is a regular writer for vibewire.net, is the theme editor for the Department of Victorian Communities YouthCentral site and as his day job is a Policy and Research Officer for Jesuit Social Services.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Tim Martyn

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 116 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Latest from QUT
 The science of reporting climate change
 Why schools need more than a business plan
 Suburban resilience
 Science unlimited
 Wake-up call for science
 More...
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy