Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

What makes a suicide bomber tick?

By Paul Wilson - posted Tuesday, 23 April 2002


What is it that motivates suicide bombers to strap on a bomb, drive to a crowded restaurant or shopping mall and blow themselves and innocent civilians into eternity?

"Evil" was the term that George Bush and John Howard used to describe the motives of terrorists after the September 11 attack on the World Trade Centre. But though the acts they commit are truly monstrous it seems inappropriate to describe suicide bombers as "evil", if only because such an expression does little to explain why they engage in such grotesque activities.

After the planes crashed into the twin towers some commentators explained the terrorists’ behaviour by way of religious fanaticism. As William Safire, the conservative New York Times columnist put it, the normal survival spirit in a terrorist is replaced by a "pseudo-religious fantasy of a killer’s self martyrdom leading to eternity in paradise surrounded by adoring virgins".

Advertisement

But do terrorists, especially suicide bombers, really think like this? Are such people so shallow and "evil" that they believe that by murdering innocent civilians - and killing themselves in the process - they will obtain a passport to heavenly bliss?

In my opinion such a view simplifies and distorts the way we both see and react to suicide bombers. Indeed, recent research, including that conducted by the Israelis themselves, shows a profile of terrorists radically different from that portrayed by William Safire.

Suicide bombers typically are unmarried men in their late teens and early 20s. Indeed, one survey found that two thirds of them were aged between 18 and 23 though there have been some that have been either much older or much younger. While over 80 per cent are single most have close relatives either living with them or residing in the same city or town.

The majority have high-school education and sometimes even a university degree. Though nearly all are male, Ayat Akhras, the 18-year-old schoolgirl who blew herself up outside a Jerusalem supermarket recently, demonstrated that young women are increasingly prepared to die for the Intifada.

"We have 200 young women from the Bethlehem area alone prepared to sacrifice themselves", a spokesperson for the al-Aqsa terrorist organisation told journalists after the supermarket bombing.

This is not empty rhetoric. Undoubtedly the Palestinians do have thousands of young women, and probably tens of thousands of young men, willing to sacrifice their lives for their cause.

Advertisement

The point here is that the psychological profiles of suicide bombers do not reveal a few isolated, emotionally disturbed, badly educated young men and women, fanatically sacrificing themselves to religious martyrdom. Instead, there are literally thousands of young men and women willing to sacrifice their lives for their country.

In a video made just before her suicide mission Ayat Akhras contemptuously remarked, "I am going to fight instead of the sleeping Arab armies who are watching Palestinian girls fighting alone".

This was hardly the statement of a disturbed young woman motivated by evil. Nor, it appears was she passively and unquestioningly obeying her political masters or acting against her will. Neither, it seems were the more than 70 other suicide bombers who have struck Israel since the signing of the Oslo agreement between the Jewish State and Palestine in 1993.

In short, interpreting the motives of suicide bombers in simple psychological or religious terms does not get us very far. Suicide bombers are motivated to commit their carnage because they believe, rightly or wrongly, they have been oppressed and humiliated by the Israelis for decades. Causing terror among their enemies is one of the few ways left to them to fight back.

What this means is that neither Arafat himself or the might of the Israeli army can stop hundreds if not thousands of young men and women from acting as deadly human missiles.

Their actions most certainly have tragic consequences that may well be described as "evil".

But their motives are political rather than satanic or fanatical and only political solutions will stop the terror from continuing.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. All

An edited version of this article was first published in The Courier Mail on 9 April 2002.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Professor Paul Wilson is a writer and criminologist. He is Dean of Humanities and Social Sciences at Bond University. He co-authored Justice in the Deep North: A History of Crime and Punishment in Queensland.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Paul Wilson
Related Links
Paul Wilson's home page
The Electronic Intifada
Photo of Paul Wilson
Article Tools
Comment Comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy