Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Shergold panned in Never Never Land

By Brian Johnstone - posted Wednesday, 1 December 2004


An article in last week’s Media section of The Australian, headlined “Police raid reignites debate on leaking”, nailed the fantasy.

Reporters Katherine Murphy and Elizabeth Colman reported that the Howard Government “is asserting its right to crack down on officials who leak confidential documents to the media”. But academics and the media union are posing the question: Will Canberra be prepared to police itself?

The article continued: “Australian National University political science professor John Wanna says governments only police the material they don’t want to see brought into the public domain. ‘These judgments can be very arbitrary and asymmetrical’, Wanna says. ‘They essentially want to police the stuff they don’t want leaked’.”

Advertisement

Mark Ryan from the Media Entertainment and Arts Alliance puts it more bluntly. “Does this mean a cabinet minister will be prosecuted if they are found to be the leaker? Governments can’t pick and choose who they go after.”

The Australian reported the debate on leaked documents had been re-ignited by the Shergold-sanctioned AFP raid on this newspaper. Its readers were informed of the Shergold warning in State of the Unit, that the police would be called to investigate any unauthorised disclosure of material. Both Wanna and the dean of the Australian New Zealand School of Government, Allan Fels told The Australian the Government had a legitimate point.

Governments needed confidentiality in order to govern effectively but the need for secrecy needed to be tempered by the responsibility of the media to investigate the activities of politicians and officials with a view to protecting the public interest. Fels put the view that this was a fraught area and a difficult one in which to find the right balance. “The whole situation is extremely complicated by controlled and semi-controlled leaks from ministers themselves,” he says.

Mr Ryan from the Media Union was having none of this. “The public interest”, he said, “is paramount". Shergold, he said, was guilty of “a massive over-reaction”.

Hear, Hear.

The Media Union’s sentiments were picked up in editorials around the country and provoked the international press freedom organisation, Reporters Without Borders, to pen a letter to PM Howard pointing out that police had violated the principle of protection of sources fundamental to guaranteeing independent, investigative journalism. What’s the bet it gets spiked on a dead letter file?

Advertisement

The Howard Government has turned politicisation of the public service and contempt for the Parliament into an art form.

It also sanctions ministerial leaks.

The classic involved our old friend Monty Burns, aka Philip Ruddock. He was silly enough to tape himself conducting a briefing for a Queensland journalist on the confidential contents of an ATSIC Fraud Awareness Unit briefing on the activities of ATSIC Commissioner Ray Robinson and the Bidjara group of companies. The tape became public property, via a leak. Ruddock’s punishment? Appointment by John Howard to the post of Federal Attorney General, the Commonwealth’s chief law officer.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

1 post so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Brian Johnstone is a columnist for the National Indigenous Times. He was Director of Media and Marketing at the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Commission between April 1998 and December 2002. Before taking up that position he was a senior advisor to former Federal Labor Minister, Senator Bob Collins, and a senior correspondent with Australian Associated Press.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Brian Johnstone
Related Links
National Indigenous Times
Photo of Brian Johnstone
Article Tools
Comment 1 comment
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy