Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

It's a fact: Socially responsible corporations are successful

By Michael Chaney - posted Tuesday, 3 August 2004


There is also compelling local evidence that the community notices and approves of what businesses are doing philanthropically.

Since "Eye on Australia" (a survey of consumer attitudes, commissioned by Grey Advertising and conducted by Sweeney Research) began asking Australians which company they trust the most, Australia Post has consistently scored highly. Consumers see Australia Post as a company that puts people before profits.

Is it a coincidence that Australia Post is also an enthusiastic financial supporter of community projects?

Advertisement

A report on this research in BRW said: "Consumers want to see more examples of companies giving back to the community at a local level. They see this happening with companies such as Australia Post, but perceive most big companies as being preoccupied with making profits."

Partnerships in the community with environmental, educational and arts organisations are investments with real business returns. So even focusing purely on why it's good for business, "business philanthropy" is clearly justified.

All the benefits to the community flowing from this support could be seen as just a byproduct of doing what's good for business, if you want to take the line that business is somehow separate from the community in which it operates.

But business does not operate in a vacuum, nor can we expect government to provide all the funding for the community programs we need to be a civil society.

If it's adding to shareholder value, and it's enriching the community, there can be no convincing argument against business philanthropy.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All

Article edited by John Neil.
If you'd like to be a volunteer editor too, click here.

This article was first published in The Age on July 26, 2004.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Michael Chaney is the Managing Director of Wesfarmers Limited. He is also a Director of BHP and Gresham Partners.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Michael Chaney
Related Links
Wesfarmers
Photo of Michael Chaney
Article Tools
Comment Comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy