Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

The F2F communities: what they are and why they still have much to give

By Mark Randell - posted Tuesday, 18 May 2004


To draw the F2F communities and the Internet together, and to try to establish some purchase on questions of the kind “What Works?” we can conceive of a single entity called a “participation space”. (For finer detail on participation spaces, see my more academic article). The park is obviously a physical space, but can be conceived also as a space for participation. Likewise, cyberspace provides a "space" for participation. Having thus converged the physical with the cyber, we can ask “What makes a participation space work?” Now obviously, there are many factors that make a physical park a success, including physical factors such as shade cover and location. If we concentrate on the "success factors" for participation, however, we might focus on such factors as “sparse connections”.

Part of what makes a participation space successful is the presence of “sparse connections”. Sparse connections imply that not everybody who participates knows everyone else. That is, the attraction of the space is that there is an element of serendipity; you are not sure who will be in the space, you are not sure what you will learn, or say, and you are not sure what connections you will make. The participants are drawn from a limited set (ie. the neighbours, or those with an interest in… …quilting), but who will attend at a given time is not predictable.

This, then, is a part of the charm of the F2F community: that the connections you make are with a set of people constrained by, say, education, means, outlook, and yet you are not able to predict which people you will interact with, or what you will find out at any given time, in the given participation space. This is what is also true of some “communities of interest” on the Internet — but the constraints are weaker. Geography, by virtue of real-world economics, provides a powerful set of constraints on the "community pool".

Advertisement

“F2F” communities are where we all live. Think about them as a space for participation, and keep your eyes peeled — there is much mystery still, and much to learn.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Mark Randell is the Principal of Human Sciences, a community development consultancy based in Fremantle, WA. He has worked in the commercial, government and academic sectors.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Mark Randell
Related Links
Human Sciences
Photo of Mark Randell
Article Tools
Comment Comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy