Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Hereís how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

How a fall in the US dollar increases the demand for commodities and manufacturing

By Michael Knox - posted Thursday, 22 March 2018


In January I attended a presentation by Valentina Bruno of the American University in Washington DC and Hyun Song Shin of The Bank of International Settlements (BIS). This presentation was given in Philadelphia.

The presenters argued that global value chains (GVC) figure prominently in global trade. GVCs lie at the intersection of two important themes. The first is the financing requirement for working capital. The second is the prevalence of dollar invoicing in global trade. The result of the interaction of these two themes, is that the dollar exchange rate emerges as a determinant of GVC activity.

Specifically, this means that "a stronger dollar is associated with tighter credit conditions and subdued GVC activity." Surprisingly, this means that exports from emerging economies may fall when their currencies fall against the US dollar.

Advertisement

The theme of the presentation was the close relationship between variation in the US Dollar and the exports of emerging economies. It appears that 82% of trade of emerging economies is financed in US dollar. It was argued that there was "Mismatching "of US dollar exposure by emerging economies. This means that US dollar exposure held by emerging economies was essentially unhedged.

In theory this would suggest that if emerging economy currencies rose against the US dollar, then there would a greater volume of funds available to finance exports and imports of US dollar denominated products in developing economies. Turns out this is also true in practice. The presenters showed charts demonstrating that the finance available to finance the trade in manufactured products made by emerging economies rose as the US dollar fell and fell as the US dollar rose.

This increase in finance had a direct result on the real volume of trade by emerging economies. They noted that it was particularly apparent when one used the Bank of International Settlements (BIS) "broad" US dollar index which includes the currencies of many developing economies.

Although this was still apparent when one used the Bank of International Settlements narrow measure of the US dollar index including the only major economies; statistically the relationship was much stronger when one used the BIS broad US dollar index.

I have found that a similar relationship to that between the broad US dollar index and the manufactured product trade of emerging economies exist for the commodities trade of emerging economies. Quite simply as the broad index of the US dollar falls, the volume traded and the price of commodities produced by emerging economies rises.

As the broad index of the US dollar rises, the volume and the price of commodities produced by emerging economies falls. This is not simply a direct currency pricing effect. As the US dollar falls, the amount of finance available to finance the international trade in commodities produced by the emerging economies rises. Thus the volume of exports of commodities by developing economies rises. The price rises too. Why is this important?

Advertisement

We are entering a period where the US budget deficit is increasing. This budget deficit is increasing in order to finance the core programs of the incumbent Republican Party. The Major tax reforms passed by the Republican Party in late 2017 are resulting in a larger US budget deficit. Increased military spending passed by the US Congress in a bipartisan bill in early 2018 will further increase the US budget deficit.

An increase in the US budget deficit will generate an increase in US demand. An increase in US demand will generate a larger US current account deficit. An increase in the US current account deficit will generate a lower US dollar. A lower US dollar will generate an increase in the volume of finance available to finance the commodity exports of emerging economies. The volume and price of internationally traded commodities will rise.

Conclusion

The increase in the US budget deficit required to finance the Republican legislative programme will have far reaching effects. The US Dollar will fall. The volume of international trade in manufactures and commodities will rise. Commodity export volumes and commodity export prices will go up. The outlook for Australian commodity exporters may be greater than we think.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. All

This article was first published by Morgans.

Disclaimer

The information contained in this report is provided to you by Morgans Financial Limited as general advice only, and is made without consideration of an individual's relevant personal circumstances. Morgans Financial Limited ABN 49 010 669 726, its related bodies corporate, directors and officers, employees, authorised representatives and agents ("Morgans") do not accept any liability for any loss or damage arising from or in connection with any action taken or not taken on the basis of information contained in this report, or for any errors or omissions contained within. It is recommended that any persons who wish to act upon this report consult with their Morgans investment adviser before doing so. Those acting upon such information without advice do so entirely at their own risk.

This report was prepared as private communication to clients of Morgans and is not intended for public circulation, publication or for use by any third party. The contents of this report may not be reproduced in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Morgans. While this report is based on information from sources which Morgans believes are reliable, its accuracy and completeness cannot be guaranteed. Any opinions expressed reflect Morgans judgement at this date and are subject to change. Morgans is under no obligation to provide revised assessments in the event of changed circumstances. This report does not constitute an offer or invitation to purchase any securities and should not be relied upon in connection with any contract or commitment whatsoever.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

2 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Michael Knox is Chief Economist and Director of Strategy at Morgans.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Michael Knox

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 2 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy