Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Government and Opposition tax policies balanced

By John Quiggin - posted Saturday, 15 September 2001


Overall, the changes to the structure of taxation under the present government have been for the worse. The prospects for the immediate future do not look promising. The government has promised to focus on the needs of its supporters earning more than $60000 a year, while Labor is still focusing on milking any residual benefits from resentment of the GST.

The Big Question, however, is not whether we should raise one tax and lower another, but how much of our national income we should spend collectively through the tax system. For many years this question has been dodged.

Although neither party has been exactly forthright, voters will be faced with a reasonably clear choice of directions in the coming elections. John Howard has asserted that health, education and other services are adequately funded and that, if they are not, this is a problem for the states. Any further surpluses will therefore be devoted to tax cuts.

Advertisement

Kim Beazley while promising not to raise taxes, has also indicated that, apart from some minor adjustments to the GST, he will not be in a hurry to cut them, spending any available funds on improved services. As the operation of bracket creep tends to slowly increase the ratio of tax revenue to GDP, this approach will allow for modest increases in the share of national income allocated to health, education and other services.

The evidence to support the proposition that we need to spend more on health and education is strong. But this is ultimately a choice that we must make as citizens, and we will get our chance soon enough.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Professor John Quiggin is an Australian Research Council Professorial Fellow based at the University of Queensland and the Australian National University.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by John Quiggin
Related Links
Australian National University
Australian Research Council
Queensland University of Technology
Photo of John Quiggin
Article Tools
Comment Comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy