Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here’s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.

 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate


On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.


RSS 2.0

Red tape reduction

By Russell Grenning - posted Thursday, 14 December 2017

He cited as an example one large employer's environmental assessment process that took more than two years, involved more than 4,000 meetings and resulting in a 12,000 page report When approved, the project faced more than 1,500 Commonwealth and State conditions with a further 8,000 sub-conditions attached to them. The process cost the company more than $25 million.

Another quite absurd example, the innovative Australian company Cochlear, the manufacturer and exporter of hearing implant devices had to wait two years to have its device pass safety checks despite having already achieved clearance by European regulators. Cochlear, formed with Commonwealth Government finance in 1981 to commercialise their product holds two-thirds of the world's hearing implant market and more than 250,000 people around the world are fitted with them.

Then there are the plainly stupid regulations – in WA, a hardware store can sell outdoor lights before 11am but no indoor lights, while petrol stations can sell cigarettes before 8am on Mondays but not nicotine patches. Pantyhose can be sold after 9pm on Thursdays but not underpants and a country pub can sell takeaway liquor on Sundays but a liquor store across the road cannot.


Mr Gilbert wrote, "A new spotlight needs to be shone on regulators themselves. The Office of Best Practice Regulation – the regulator for good regulation, which sits in the Prime Minister's Department – needs the power to hold proponents of additional regulation to account. Taxpayers deserve to know that they are getting value for money."

That just might not happen.

Minister James Hacker from Yes Minister once observed, "The three articles of Civil Service faith: it takes longer to do things quickly, it's more expensive to do things cheaply and it's more democratic to do them in secret."

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All

Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

3 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Russell Grenning is a retired political adviser and journalist who began his career at the ABC in 1968 and subsequently worked for the then Brisbane afternoon daily, The Telegraph and later as a columnist for The Courier Mail and The Australian.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Russell Grenning

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 3 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy