Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.

 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate


On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.


RSS 2.0

Why the fuss about the Year 1 literacy and numeracy screen?

By Jo Rogers - posted Friday, 1 December 2017

Here is another example of how this works at the coal face. Recently I sat with a friend's child who is six years old, in Year 1 at a good school. He is very bright, has excellent oral language, eats and sleeps well and has been read books since he was born. His school report is excellent and he has been at school for 1 ½ years now.

I showed him the CVC words, cat, bit, sat, pan, ham, men, mop, fun and asked him if he could read them. He looked and said, "I only know 'sat' because it is a sight word." He couldn't read any other words.

When he showed me his writing, there was only a row of letters but no words and he couldn't spell the word 'sat'. I knew his teacher was still using the 'whole language' approach.


If this child had been taught phonics, he could have read and spelt all of these words and probably used that knowledge to read words like catch, cattle, caterpillar, pancake, panda, panic, hamburger, handle, hammer, and satellite, because he could decode the first syllable. This child may or may not be taught systematic phonics next year; it's all a matter of chance. He may fall behind and either fail or academically underachieve all through school.

This is not good enough when the information and scientific evidence is available. It is not fair to that child or any other child in a country as good as Australia. It's not fair to his teacher either as she would enjoy knowing how to teacher her students to read and write in a much more effective way. Young primary teachers want access to this information.

Let's not allow politics and egos to get in the way of something so easily possible to improve Australia's children's reading standards. It's not about getting teachers with higher ATAR scores, or about funding, or anything else other than this one issue and it's well over due to allow our children to be taught by the best beginning reading teaching approach.

The Year 1 Literacy and Numeracy Screen, with its phonics component, is the single best and most cost effective initiative to improve Australian children's reading outcomes.

When the Education Ministers meet on 8th December, I really hope they will all decide to implement Literacy and Numeracy Screen test in all States for all Year 1 children.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. All

To support the test, sign the petition by clicking here. You can also join the campaign by following the Say YES to the Phonics Screening Check Facebook page.

Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

16 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Jo Rogers is an experienced primary and special education teacher who has been teaching synthetic phonics since 1968.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Jo Rogers

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Jo Rogers
Article Tools
Comment 16 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy