Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Wary Nicholls dressed in clothes tailored by enemies

By Graham Young - posted Wednesday, 29 November 2017


Labor’s strong negative ads then alleged a vote for Hanson was a vote for Nicholls, and vice-versa. This worked, not so much because voters were horrified at the thought – some were, though generally habitual Greens and Labor voters - but because Nicholls looked weak.

The LNP lost this election 2 years and 10 months ago when they decided to walk away from the entire Newman legacy, rather than just Newman. In doing so, they accepted Labor’s framing, and the best they could do was apologise and promise to be a responsible, more regional, old-economy version of Labor.

Newman is widely loathed, but many respect his legacy and he lost on a protest vote more than performance

Advertisement

Nicholls is neither loathed, nor loved. He’s that most vulnerable of political creatures, the pale man, ripe to be dressed in the clothes his enemies tailor for him.

A stronger personality with a distinct agenda might have prevailed. Lack of courage to state the obvious about relations with One Nation was read as weakness and unreliability.

The One Nation wedge is particularly difficult for the conservatives. Greens voters preference Labor 80% or better while One Nation preferences in Queensland worked against the LNP incumbents in seats like Mansfield and Mt Ommaney.

Destroying One Nation is not an option. You can seduce their voters, but if you threaten to bludgeon them they will know you weren’t listening in the first place and double down.

Neither is splitting the LNP into two separate parties. If it were, then One Nation would not have achieved its first success in 1998 - before the LNP merger.

One factor that led to a high One Nation vote was that neither Labor nor Liberal gave a compelling reason for voters to prefer them over their opponent either through their performance as government and opposition, or during the campaign.

Advertisement

It was risk averse and business as usual, and the LNP didn’t even run a negative campaign, until too late in the election.

Some MPs have tried to make this into an issue for Malcolm Turnbull. It is, and it isn’t. It’s not directly his fault, but it could be his problem.

These are tough, no-nonsense people in regional seats who are facing tough economic circumstances. They don’t want 100 words when 10 will do. They suspect city slickers, particularly lawyers.

They’re apprehensive of strangers, and they like to keep jobs at home, but they are also economic conservatives who value family and traditional values. And they are not overly concerned which side forms the government if they get what they want.

Turnbull needs a clear and honest answer to his relationship with them, as well as a positive and negative pitch for government, unlike his Queensland counterparts. And he needs to lift his first preference above 40%.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All

This article was first published in the Australian Financial Review.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

6 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Graham Young is chief editor and the publisher of On Line Opinion. He is executive director of the Australian Institute for Progress, an Australian think tank based in Brisbane, and the publisher of On Line Opinion.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Graham Young

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Graham Young
Article Tools
Comment 6 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy