3. Jordan's
- invasion and annexation of the disputed territories, contrary to international law, between 1948 and 1967 and
- continuing role in the disputed territories by extending Jordanian citizenship to the Arabs resident there until 1988
stamp it as eminently suited to resolve a problem it helped to create.
Advertisement
4. History, geography and demography qualify Jordan and Israel – the two successor States to 95% of the territory of the British Mandate - to resolve sovereignty over the disputed territories - just 4% of the Mandate.
Netanyahu eloquently articulated this position at the United Nations on 11 December 1984:
Clearly, in Eastern and Western Palestine, there are only two peoples, the Arabs and the Jews. Just as clearly, there are only two states in that area, Jordan and Israel. The Arab State of Jordan, containing some three million Arabs, does not allow a single Jew to live there. It also contains 4/5 of the territory originally allocated by this body's predecessor, the League of Nations, for the Jewish National Home. The other State, Israel, has a population of over four million, of which one sixth is Arab. It contains less than 1/5 of the territory originally allocated to the Jews under the Mandate.... It cannot be said, therefore, that the Arabs of Palestine are lacking a state of their own. The demand for a second Palestinian Arab State in Western Palestine, and a 22nd Arab State in the world, is merely the latest attempt to push Israel back into the hopelessly vulnerable armistice lines of 1949.
5. Tensions on the Temple Mount causing protests in Amman and an attack on the Israeli Embassy in Amman show this window of opportunity is rapidly disappearing.
This fetid swamp urgently needs draining - Israel and Jordan are the parties that can make it happen.
President Trump – over to you to weave your proven negotiating skills.
Discuss in our Forums
See what other readers are saying about this article!
Click here to read & post comments.
7 posts so far.