Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Time for compromise on same-sex marriage

By John de Meyrick - posted Thursday, 22 June 2017


 

·        There is concern that by changing the definition of marriage in the Marriage Act 1961 (Cth) – being, “the union of a man and a woman…” – to be just, “the union of any two people…” as proposed, will not only dilute the concept of traditional marriage, but that it would also encourage various undesirable unions to seek recognition as well.

 

Advertisement

·        Marriage is a fundamental precept of all the major religions of the World, all of which oppose same-sex marriage. According to the ABS, at least 65 percent of our religiously diverse population in Australia still claim adherence to particular religious faiths. Reliable polls also show 48 percent of the adult population regard homosexuality as morally wrong. So genuine support for same-sex marriage is far from assured.

 

·        Changing community values and attitudes, influenced by anti-discrimination laws, are now more tolerant and accepting of homosexuals and same-sex unions than before. As so many people now just live together for whatever reason, lack of formal recognition of same-sex unions is not critical to its social status. There is no longer any reason for gay couples to feel stigmatised or socially uncomfortable.

 

·        Although informal polls can be reasonably accurate, at times they can be surprisingly wrong; and on an issue as important as changing the definition of “marriage” to deem everybody else’s marriage to be the same thing as a same-sex union, means many people privately hold an opposing view to that which they may openly express on the pretention that same-sex marriage is now the political correct view to adopt.

 

Advertisement

Now there are advocates on both sides who, no doubt, will want to argue with this analysis, as well as others who will nit-pick away at the subject for evermore. But one way or another the issue must and will be resolved. Only one thing is certain. The public is heartily sick of it and wants it settled.

 

The Government has proposed a national plebiscite. The Opposition with The Greens (believing they have the numbers) want it to be resolved by the Parliament as a ‘conscience’ free vote.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. Page 4
  6. 5
  7. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

40 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

John de Meyrick is a barrister (ret’d), lecturer and writer on legal affairs.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by John de Meyrick

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of John de Meyrick
Article Tools
Comment 40 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy