Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here’s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Hysteria takes no prisoners and solves no problems

By John Slater - posted Monday, 18 July 2016


This week's episode of Q&A exposed what many of us have long suspected – the far-left are co-opting domestic violence as a weapon of cultural warfare.

If the media lynching of panellist Steve Price in the days that followed is any indication; the left are winning it convincingly.

Price's interjections following Badham's remark that he had 'probably' been in groups or made similar jokes to Eddie McGuire's ill-conceived remarks about Caroline Wilson were entirely justified. Why should Price have sat silently while Badham singled him out in her claim that a culture of entrenched, society-wide sexism was to blame for scourge of domestic violence?

Advertisement

Not to be deterred, Badham insisted that Price's comments 'proved her point very excellently about the kinds of attitudes that create these problems.'

According to Badham, if you don't share her view that domestic violence derives from cultural norms which promote gender inequality, then you are too are part of the problem.

This is explains why commentators like Badham and her ilk fixated with such zeal on Eddie McGuire's comments for weeks after they were made. The narrative is that domestic violence doesn't just lie with the feckless men who hit their spouses but also with a culture that has normalised and even promotes these horrendous acts. This is why so many refused to accept Maguire's apology at face value. The joke wasn't just a poor choice of words from a man with a long and distinguished history of saying stupid things; it was an insight into the way that everyday male buffoonery teaches us that it's okay to abuse woman.

This is a convenient vision for those who attracted to the idea that society can be neatly divided into permanent classes of villains and long suffering victims – particularly along gender lines. But when tested against the hard facts, it gives way to some uncomfortable truths.

Domestic violence is heavily concentrated in poorer regional and outer suburb areas where social dysfunction – alcoholism, drug abuse and you guessed it; violence in general– are already rife. Indeed, The Australian Bureau of Statistics expressly notes that socioeconomic status, social and geographical isolation and substance abuse are the three leading environmental factors linked to domestic violence. As Miranda Devine pointed out last year, the incidence of domestic violence in the New South Wales town of Bourke is more than 60 times higher than the northern suburbs of Sydney.

Also roundly ignored is the fact that domestic violence rates are often highest in remote Indigenous communities, where substance abuse and high unemployment have become a permanent feature of everyday life.

Advertisement

None of this is surprising. Low education attainment, unemployment, drug and alcohol abuse beget a toxic cycle of poor self esteem and mental illness. Yes, some degree of domestic violence can be found across all corners of the country. But if you crunch the numbers, it's clear there are more potent forces at play than asinine jokes on television talk shows.

The pantomime continued the night after on the Project, where hosts Carrie Bickmore and Waleed Aly lectured Price about his choice of the word 'hysterical' to describe Badham's diatribe. In one of his trademark displays of self-regarding righteousness, Waleed went on to criticize Price's word choice because the semantic origins of hysterical meant women 'were irrational or incapable of being rational because they had ovaries.'

This seems to be what Badham was getting at when she made her vulgar retort that her 'ovaries made her do it.' The obvious point here is that ordinary people like Price's listeners aren't in the habit of discerning someone's intention by recourse to a word's Greek or Latin origins. But it also reflects the eagerness of identity politics devotees like Waleed to view the world along gendered lines. Any possible example – not matter how far flung – is seized on evidence to further the narrative that women remain a downtrodden underclass.

Instead of baying for Eddie Maguire's blood, the domestic violence banner-carriers should spend some time visiting Cape York, Aurukun taking the drive from the ABC studios in Ultimo out to Sydney's welfare-centred urban fringes. This would at least show them firsthand that the cultural problems that go hand in hand with domestic violence are far more tangible than dim-witted asides on the footy show and ABC.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

15 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

John Slater is the Executive Director of the H R Nicholls Society.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by John Slater

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of John Slater
Article Tools
Comment 15 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy