Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Crossing the Rubicon

By Gregory Melleuish - posted Tuesday, 28 June 2016


It is interesting that John Pilger in a New Matilda piece is far more scathing about Hillary Clinton than Trump.  Trump, he argues, is a ‘maverick’, who, at least does not hate Russia and who condemns the American war in Iraq in 2003.  He is not part of the Establishment.

Ironically Bill Clinton was taught by Carroll Quigley who argued that there was an Anglo-American establishment who pulled the strings in the modern world.  Now Hillary is associated by many with that establishment.

Even if Trump is elected, it will undoubtedly be the case that he will not be able to fulfil the expectations which his supporters have placed in him, at least in a material sense.  What he might be able to do is to activate self-belief.  His importance, for his supporters, is symbolic. 

Advertisement

The same may be said regarding the recent Brexit vote in the United Kingdom.  It was a symbolic renunciation of the failures of the British political class.  But the real question is whether there is a leader in the United Kingdom who is willing to do the heavy lifting and act as a sort of Caesar to bring the decision made by the British people to fruition.  If someone does not step up, then institutional inertia, masses of regulation, the sort of thing on which Brussels thrives, may thwart the will of the British people.

The question may well be asked: why has an Australian equivalent of Trump not emerged as it faces similar problems to America?  In Australia there would appear to be a loss of faith in the capacity of the political class to do anything except look after itself.

In a sense, Australia has had its Trump in the shape of Clive Palmer who both peaked too early and failed to inspire in his Caesarist role.  His legacy has been to leave behind a series of ’mini-mes’ in the shape of Jacqui Lambie and Glenn Lazarus.  The only problem is that such individuals lack both the celebrity status and the money required to aspire to being Caesar.

Caesar, of course, won power, and instituted many reforms, including a new calendar.  But he could never win over the political class who eventually decided that he had to go, as happened on the Ides of March.  It was left to his young heir, Octavian, to devise means of changing the political system while also placating, and eventually neutering, the political class.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

2 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Gregory Melleuish is associate professor of history and politics at University of Wollongong.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Gregory Melleuish

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Gregory Melleuish
Article Tools
Comment 2 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy