Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

We need a better system for preselecting election candidates

By Michael Lee and Graham Young - posted Monday, 15 January 2001


Revelations at the Shepherdson Inquiry illustrate the bankruptcy of the Australian party political system. It is a cartel run by a pair of oligopolies. If you are not a member of the club you have little chance of becoming an MP.

Somewhere around 70 percent of seats never change hands between parties. The people who hold those seats are not concerned about general elections. The only time their ownership of the seat is at risk is at their preselections. Electoral records show that Curaçao Fischer Catt was successfully enrolled with the Australian Electoral Commission. If preselected by a major party for one of its safe seats, Curaçao would have been the member, despite being a cat of the one "t" variety. No cats have yet been preselected, but quite a few donkeys have, and the electorate knows it.

One Nation campaigned against the cartel, calling it the Laboral Party, but One Nation was the least democratic of the parties. Its corporate structure entrenched power permanently in the hands of Pauline and the two Davids. The major political parties are more democratic, but over time tend to become captive of a dominant internal faction.

Advertisement

The membership of political parties has been shrinking, representing only one per cent of the total population. This smaller size makes it easier to manipulate party structures and demonstrates that ordinary electors have been turned off by internal party machinations.

Ryan, the leafy Brisbane electorate which is home to the majority of the City’s professionals is a case in point. This electorate is to Queensland’s Liberals what Kooyong, the seat of Robert Menzies and Andrew Peacock, is to Victoria’s. Yet Michael Johnson, a young Australian lawyer of Chinese extraction, is likely to win preselection for it, not because of his demonstrated political ability, but because he is alleged to have stacked the pre-selection council by signing up 400 ethnic Chinese to the Liberal Party.

As a result, senior Liberals are apparently ceding him the pre-selection and threatening to run an independent conservative candidate once he wins. They believe that this will give the electorate a member more representative of the Liberal cause who at a later date may elect to join the Liberal Party. Essentially they are saying that the party’s internal processes have become so corrupted that all electors should have a say in selecting its candidate.

After 100 years of Federation it is time to return politics to the people and ensure that parties work to the benefit of the many rather than the few.

That requires not just an eight point plan, as proposed by the Queensland Premier, that will tinker around the edges but leave the internal systemic bastardisation intact, but a more radical democratic approach. When the USA faced similar problems 100 years ago it invented primary elections.

Primary elections take the place of Australian preselections. Where they differ is that they are run by organisations similar to our Electoral Commission. Any voter who registers with the local Electoral Commission organisation as a supporter of a particular party can vote in that party's primary. They don't have to attend branch meetings, pay membership dues or tout for votes on street corners, just register.

Advertisement

The system has many benefits. It ensures that only those people living in the seat, not remote party committees or cohorts of bused in activists, select candidates who will represent them.

In America about a third of all voters participate in the primaries. Adjusting for our compulsory system that means that a Liberal primary in a safe seat like Ryan would involve say 10,000 people, completely diluting the influence of the 400 or so ethnic Chinese allegedly stacking the area. A system like this is more attractive to good candidates who might be ideal for politics but, having established themselves in another career, are not about to brown-nose factional hacks for the honour of being an MP.

Candidates who are directly selected by their electorate would also be more inclined to speak out against the orthodoxy within their own party. They would be more prepared to vote against their own party on matters of principal, and where their own electorate's interests diverge. The party organisations would still retain substantial influence but it would be more evenly shared with the electorate.

Primaries would also make it more difficult for candidates to hide their policies and win an electoral contest by ambush. They would have to reveal their hand well before the general election to win their primary.

The logic underlying primaries is that in safe seats the same party almost invariably wins because voters tend to vote for governments, not individuals. A primary gives electors an opportunity to choose between individual candidates representing the party that they want to elect to government, without compromising the possibility of their party becoming the government because the candidate they like is running for the opposing team.

There are some bugs to this system. One of them is that a rich person could virtually buy themselves a primary - New Jersey Senator, Jon Corzine spent $30 million winning his primary. But rich people can almost buy themselves an endorsement here under the current system. One solution would be to put limits on permitted spending in a primary. The electoral commission could also help out, as it does in a referendum, by publishing a booklet for each electorate giving each of the candidates space for a one page personal explanation and message.

Others would point to the dangers of populism. Members of Parliament could be driven by short-term concerns that appeal to their primary voters rather than taking the longer-term view they can under the party system. This is the type of argument that has always been employed against expanding democracy - the people can't be trusted.

This proposal is not a concluded one. Many factors need to be considered, and perhaps a scaled-down version might be more acceptable in Australia. In just 10 years a lot has changed in Queensland. The gerrymander has been dismantled, and as a result of Shepherdson, enrolment and voting procedures will be tightened to prevent casual fraud. But there is more to be done. Kudos will go to whichever leader - Borbidge or Beattie - takes the further step and provides electors with a preselection system that gives them a real choice.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. All

An edited version of this article appeared in The Courier Mail on 29th December, 2000.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Authors

Michael Lee is a Brisbane based consultant who assesses economic loss in litigation matters. His interests include human rights, American political history, and Native Title.

Graham Young is chief editor and the publisher of On Line Opinion. He is executive director of the Australian Institute for Progress, an Australian think tank based in Brisbane, and the publisher of On Line Opinion.

Other articles by these Authors

All articles by Michael Lee
All articles by Graham Young
Related Links
Queensland Labor Party
Queensland Liberal Party
Shepherdson Enquiry
Article Tools
Comment Comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy