Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here’s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Nitschke does the predictable: favours Exit over Medicine

By Paul Russell - posted Tuesday, 1 December 2015


A month ago, after making a plea bargain to avoid medical tribunal hearings expected to take up to six weeks in Darwin, Philip Nitschke accepted significant restrictions being placed on his licence to practice medicine in return for avoiding a drawn out and very public airing of the 12 complaints lodged against him with the Australian Medical Board.

Then he announced that he is surrendering his medical licence so as to continue his work with Exit International unshackled from any restriction.

In Darwin, at his media conference, Nitschke set alight his medical practice certificate in outright defiance of the medical board and their restrictions made in good faith. Eighteen years ago, in Canberra, Nitschke also set alight to a copy of the Euthanasia Laws Act which overturned the world's first euthanasia laws enacted less than a year earlier in the Northern Territory.

Advertisement

This has the air of a very elaborate and callous charade that seemingly has rewarded public tantrum and trampled due process and justice.

I'm angry. Very angry. A number of the complaints that Nitschke has artfully dodged are tragedies of personal family loss. These families deserved their 'day in court'; they deserved the opportunity to tell their story and to warn Australia and the world about the risks of association with Exit and Philip Nitschke. Above all, they deserve some sense of justice; some closure for their great loss. At least with Nitschke silenced by the Medical Board, he might not be a risk to others, so we all thought.

There are others, like myself, who made complaints purely out of concern for public safety. Readers may choose to dismiss my claim that there is a risk. After all, as some have observed, Nitschke is something of a cult hero to many. Trouble is, no-one gets to make that judgement for themselves.

And so, he casts off his medical licence to continue his work at Exit. Well that all sounds rather ethical doesn't it? When faced with two mutually exclusive choices, decide in favour of one and shun the other. Bravo! But forgive me if I see a metaphorical index finger rising here. This is Nitschke in today's Age newspaper:

"I will remain a doctor and will legitimately use that title, and I will continue to see patients and Exit members in clinics that I run in Australia and other countries," Dr Nitschke told reporters in Darwin on Friday as he set his certificate alight.

Clinics? Patients? Sounds like medical practice to me. In his press release, he added: "Indeed while in Darwin this visit I will be seeing two terminal patients who have sought my advice."

Advertisement

But to put the matter of ethics beyond any doubt, Nitschke conducted a survey of, wait for it, Exit members who, surprisingly told Nitschke to get back to work!

Total spin from Exit's newsletter: The 'Future of Exit Survey' was open to Exit members from around the world. Exit's newsletter says that members 'have 2 options: 1. Should Philip give up his medical registration and continue his pioneering work at Exit? 2. Should Philip close Exit and keep his medical registration?'

Of the 1125 people who took the survey, 97.87% said that Nitschke should continue his work at Exit International. That's quite a small voter turn out for an international organisation. Nevertheless, the overwhelming response will no doubt have been convincing.

But numbers don't really matter in a personality cult. Cue Edward Elgar's Pomp and Circumstance:

"I will retain my directorship of Exit International and will continue to work towards a future where all rational adults have access to the information and means to peacefully end their lives at the time of their choosing. In particular, I will pursue the policies recently outlined by the Dutch voluntary euthanasia society NVVE to ensure that all adults over the age of 70 have access to a reliable Peaceful Pill. In addition, I will continue to seek political support in Australia for the decriminalisation of possession and importation of small quantities (<15gm) of Nembutal."

Sounds more like a business plan than a social movement manifesto. Civil disobedience is one thing, knowingly putting lives at risk is another

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. All

This article was first published on Hope.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

11 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Paul Russell is the Director of HOPE: preventing euthanasia & assisted suicide www.noeuthanasia.org.au.


Paul is also Vice Chair of the International Euthanasia Prevention Coalition

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Paul Russell

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Paul Russell
Article Tools
Comment 11 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy