Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

How can some of our returned service personnel be 'aliens' in Australia?

By Andrew Murray - posted Monday, 9 February 2004


The recent High Court decision in Shaw v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (9 December 2003) has serious implications for those shipped to Australia as children under the child migration schemes that operated up until the late 1960s.

As minors mostly in British institutions, those young children had no choice when they were deported to Australia.

It is now the case that a person born outside Australia to non-Australian parents, who came here after 1949 and who has not been naturalised, is an "alien" for immigration purposes.

Advertisement

The Shaw case overrules Re Patterson: Ex parte Taylor (2001) where a High Court majority held that there was a middle-category termed "non-citizens non-aliens", consisting of British subjects who arrived in Australia before 1973 or 1987 and who could not be removed under migration law.

By abandoning this category, the ageing cohort of former child migrants again face problems with their Australian residency status.

Shamefully, although living in Australia for decades, they face the absurdity of being legally classified "aliens".

Although Patterson offered temporary - albeit short - respite from this unfair situation, the decision in Shaw means yet again that those former child migrants who have never received Australian citizenship are "aliens" in the country they identify with most.

Australian citizenship emerged as a controversial issue during the 2001 Senate Community Affairs References Inquiry into Child Migration. Many witnesses told of humiliating and stressful experiences when attempting to undertake overseas travel or applying for social security.

Imagine being deported to Australia as a child, being raised (often cruelly) in orphanages, then paying your taxes and dues as an Australian, and even fighting for your country - only to discover you are classed as a "non-citizen", an "alien" and could face deportation again.

Advertisement

The International Association of Former Child Migrants and their Families stated in their submission to the Senate Inquiry that many of its members:

>…served in the Australian military and fought for Australia in Korea or Vietnam, or both, but when we wanted to claim social security benefits, we were told we were aliens, and if we couldn’t prove how we arrived in Australia we would be deported.

Shock and humiliation were the feelings described by many witnesses when told by the authorities they were "non-citizens". One stated that it took six months for him to be "cleared". "I was accused of being a criminal and I got no apology whatsoever …".

Accordingly, recommendation 17 of the unanimous Senate Committee Report, Lost Innocents: Righting the Record, recommended “that the Commonwealth Government confer automatic citizenship on all former child migrants, with provision for those who do not wish to become Australian citizens to decline automatic citizenship.”

Regrettably and wrongly, in May 2002 the Federal Coalition government rejected this recommendation, stating that it did “not consider that automatic conferral of Australian citizenship is always in the best interests of former child migrants. … The government will, however, examine ways to fast-track applications …”.

The Shaw decision makes "fast-tracking" no longer possible because former child migrants are again "aliens". These aliens arrived here with the active participation of successive Australian governments as a policy to cheaply populate our country with "good white stock".

"We will decide who comes here and on what terms", says the government. Fair enough, you say - until you realise how hard-hearted and unreasonable they can be.

The government should not be able to chuck out ageing Australian residents who have lived here since small children. Recommendation 17 needs revisiting and immediate implementation.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

1 post so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Senator Andrew Murray is Taxation and Workplace Relations Spokesperson for the Australian Democrats and a Senator for Western Australia.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Andrew Murray
Related Links
Andrew Murray's home page
Department of Immigration
Photo of Andrew Murray
Article Tools
Comment 1 comment
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy