Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Magna Carta: its myths, mistakes and misconceptions

By John de Meyrick - posted Friday, 21 August 2015


Democracy had its early beginning in England fifty years after Magna Carta when the barons were having similar troubles with John's son, Henry III, and Simon de Montfort in 1265 summoned a meeting of barons, bishops, two knights, burgesses and others representing counties, shires and towns, to a meeting in Westminster. That gathering, although short-lived, is regarded to have been the beginning of representative government.

Taxation: Magna Carta was also erroneously construed by some commentators who claimed that its "essential principle" is that "taxes could not be levied without consent". There is nothing in Magna Carta to support that view.

Whilst Magna Carta was very much about socage and knight's fee (land rents and military service), its "essential principle" was simply a matter that if the king wanted (demanded) an oath of fealty from his barons and the commitment to provide ever increasing financial support, then he had to agree to certain demands in return. It was never a matter of "consent". It was a matter of hard bargaining.

Advertisement

Habeas Corpus: The most important clause in Magna Carta that provides that "No free man shall be seized or imprisoned, or stripped of his rights, or possessions [etc]" was not 'proclaimed' by Magna Carta, as most commentators asserted. It derives from the 1166 Assize of Clarendon enacted during the reign of Henry II. Magna Carta did however, firmly state the principle for posterity.

To no one will we sell: The clause that begins with these words and which sought to prevent the King from refusing, delaying or demanding money in respect of the right of justice, was not a provision first held by Magna Carta. It too derives from another statute; the 1212 Simon de Montfort (Fr.) Statute of Pamiers, then applicable in England.

Separation of Powers: The separation of powers between the king and the judiciary did not begin with Magna Carta as some also claimed. It was also (insecurely) established by the Assize of Clarendon.

Trial By Jury: This was another claim made as a 'first' for Magna Carta which also derived from the Assize of Clarendon.

Equality Before The Law: Yet another 'longbow' claim that was made for Magna Carta is not born out by any study of its influence on legal development.

There are other myths and misconceptions about Magna Carta as well as some disagreeable things in it, particularly in relation to the (then) attitude towards Jews and the treatment of women which most commentators tend not to mention.

Advertisement

So why did it become iconic? Well the real significance of the 1215 version of Magna Carta is that it was the first such document to last, despite being repudiated and annulled ten weeks after it was agreed to, because the King died and the barons put his nine-year old son on the throne and issued two revised versions in his name and held him to a third version for the 56 years of his reign.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

5 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

John de Meyrick is a barrister (ret’d), lecturer and writer on legal affairs.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by John de Meyrick

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of John de Meyrick
Article Tools
Comment 5 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy