Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Welcoming the Rohingya refugees is not a viable option for Timor-Leste

By Dionisio Da Cruz Pereira - posted Thursday, 21 May 2015


Third, the current refugee crisis in South Asia involved Indonesia, Malaysia, Burma, and Thailand is the product of the policy of the ASEAN's commitment to non-interference in member states' internal affairs. Though one of the principles of the ASEAN Charter is "upholding international law with respect to human rights, social justice and multilateral trade", yet when it comes to implementation, some of the core rules are often overlooked.

For many years, the Burmese government has carried out systematic human rights abuses against the Rohingya community, yet most member states remained silent. Since the crisis unfolded, no head of state within ASEAN, including prominent Human Right Activist and 1991 Peace Prize Winner, Aung San Suu Kyi, have ever come out and vociferously voiced concerns over the issues and, offered immediate solutions. They are adamant and reluctant to finding solutions to the problems while the refugees are dying.

Empirical evidence suggests that the current trigger of conflicts in many developing countries - ranging from wars, hungers, internally displaced people to environmental damage - is direct and indirect consequences of rich countries' foreign policies imposing upon the poor. If this was the case, why should the poor bear the cost? Ultimately, responsibility to protect and care for refugees should lie within the United Nations and the international community, not the other way around.

Advertisement

Hence, right now it is not conducive for Timor-Leste to accept the Rohingya refugees while the government is being overwhelmed with its own national priorities. If democratic and stable governments like Malaysia, Indonesia, Thailand, and others cannot resolve the issue, why should Timor-Leste take the responsibility to share the burden? It is, however, plausible for Timor-Leste to contribute ideas and financial supports through the UNHCR to help settling the refugees. Likewise, it is incumbent upon the international community to address the root causes of the problems rather than shift responsibilities around.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

8 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Dionisio Da Cruz Pereira is pursuing an M.Sc in International Development at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Dionisio Da Cruz Pereira

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Dionisio Da Cruz Pereira
Article Tools
Comment 8 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy