Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Push to close Australia's native timber industry to 'save' forest carbon based on flawed science

By Mark Poynter - posted Monday, 17 November 2014


Keith et al have determined this figure from just one year's harvest sales records for the whole of Victoria, including from the full suite of forest types. Using the same methodology, VicForests' sales records over the past three-years show sawlog comprising a significantly higher average of 37% of statewide log production.

Furthermore, this statewide figure doesn't reflect the greater proportional sawlog production from the higher quality ash regrowth forests of the Central Highlands' study area.

According to VicForests, the sawlog proportion of all logs harvested from the study area's ash regrowth forests typically varies from 35 – 40%, but can be as high as 50%, depending on the forest quality in the particular harvesting coupe.

Advertisement

This error significantly understates how much harvested wood is actually made into solid timber products capable of long-term carbon storage.

An erroneous conclusion that sawn timber ultimately comprises only 4% of the total merchantable above-ground tree biomass of the harvested forest.

This is a consequence of the first two mistakes and grossly understates the reality.

If these mistakes are corrected to reflect the real situation, the sawn timber component is actually likely to be three or more times greater than the 4% figure used by Keith et al in their carbon accounting calculations.

A critically wrong assumption that mountain ash forests being used for wood production in Victoria's Central Highlands are being managed on a 50-year cycle of harvest and regeneration, rather than the reality of 80 years.

While Victoria's Timber Industry Strategy (2009) was cited as the source of this claim, a search of this document found that it contained no reference to a 50-year harvest rotation. In fact, it is well-known that VicForests are planning an 80-year rotation length for that proportion of Central Highlands mountain ash forests which is available for future use.

Advertisement

This is another significant error because it assumes that forest waste from future timber harvesting will be burnt and emit carbon at nearly twice the actual planned frequency.

Major over-stating of the area of Central Highlands' ash forest that is being annually harvested and regenerated.

Keith et al (2014) has based its carbon accounting on 20,600 ha of forest being harvested over the five years from 2011 – 16. This is around three times greater than the reality. Part of this period has already passed and the actually harvested areas for the first three years total 4,200 ha – in 2010/11 – 1600ha; 2011/12 – 1300ha; and 2012/2013 – 1300ha.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

6 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Mark Poynter is a professional forester with 40 years experience. He is a Fellow of the Institute of Foresters of Australia and his book Going Green: Forests, fire, and a flawed conservation culture, was published by Connor Court in July 2018.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Mark Poynter

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Mark Poynter
Article Tools
Comment 6 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy