Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here’s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Plain packaging does more harm than good

By David Leyonhjelm - posted Monday, 5 May 2014


For every problem the government tries to solve, it often creates at least one more with no guarantee of fixing the initial problem. That appears to be the case with the former government's laws mandating the plain packaging of tobacco.

In April 2010 when Kevin Rudd first announced the plan, there was some scepticism as to whether it would work. Then Opposition Leader Tony Abbott said: "Now, the Coalition in principle supports all reasonable measures to get smoking rates down. My anxiety with this is that it might end up being counter-productive in practice."

Coalition deputy Warren Truss said his "chief criticism is that for all the cost and the inconvenience it will not deliver any result", concluding that "Australia's bulldust barometers are well tuned, and they have been red hot on this government for a while".

Advertisement

Particularly alarming was the absence of any evidence to support the proposition. Then shadow Attorney-General, George Brandis, in a debate with Penny Wong on ABC radio, put it best when he said: "And what Penny is pleased to describe as evidence is not evidence at all. It's a supposition. It may or may not be right. But it's not an evidence-based supposition."

This scepticism appears to have been well founded. After nearly 18 months of operation, plain packaging is not having the effect its advocates intended. Last month, Fairfax newspapers reported official industry data showing that "deliveries of tobacco to retailers in Australia rose slightly last year for the first time in at least five years, even after the introduction of plain packaging aimed at deterring smokers". The news piece also reported that "in 2013, the first full year of plain packaging, tobacco companies sold the equivalent of 21.074 billion cigarettes in Australia … that marks a 0.3 per cent increase from 2012."

But while it failed to reduce smoking rates, plain packaging has led Australia into a legal minefield. Major trading partner Indonesia, along with Ukraine, Cuba, Dominican Republic and Honduras have taken action through the World Trade Organisation to challenge Australia's plain packaging legislation, with a further 35 countries possibly joining the dispute as third parties. They argue it creates an unnecessary barrier to trade in violation of our treaty obligations.

In a second case, Philip Morris Asia is suing the Australian Government under the terms of the Australia – Hong Kong Bilateral Investment Treaty, which provides protections for international investments in Australia including in intellectual property.

These two international cases, which will be decided in the next two to three years, could prove financially disastrous. An adverse result could find Australian taxpayers on the receiving end of a compensation claim worth billions of dollars. Former Fairfax business commentator, Tim Colebatch, said the WTO case "is shaping up to become the biggest trade dispute Australia has ever faced as a defendant."

There is another issue too. A recent KPMG study found that since the introduction of plain packaging, the black market in illicit tobacco in Australia has boomed, growing by 19% in 2013, and is now costing the government up to $1.1 billion in forgone annual tax revenue. The report also shows a 35% growth in illicit tobacco consumption since the 25% excise increase in April 2010. Australia already has the highest cigarette prices in the region, a whopping 75% higher than Singapore, so it's not hard to imagine what the forthcoming series of four annual 12.5% excise increases will do to the illicit market.

Advertisement

On 24 October 2013 the Australian Federal Police, Customs, Victoria Police and the Australian Crime Commission announced the arrest of 10 people for alleged illegal tobacco importation with around 71 tonnes and 80 million cigarette sticks seized and an estimated total defrauded taxation revenue of more than $67 million. And just two months ago, Victorian Police announced the second major bust in less than 6 months of crime gangs involved in illegal tobacco operations including the seizure of 35,000 tobacco plants.

For the government, the proliferation of illegal tobacco in the community is a very significant concern. It is not only lost taxation revenue, but a totally unregulated market with no rules or laws about who it sells to, including minors.

The prospect that plain packaging will put further strain on a budget already in the red, whilst fostering a new black market, should be a salutary lesson that governments can't fix every problem. It is also a reminder that governments that inherit bad policy should have the courage to stick to their original convictions and review legislation that clearly isn't working.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. All

This article was first published in The Australian FInancial Review.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

62 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

David Leyonhjelm is the Liberal Democrat Senator for NSW.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by David Leyonhjelm

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of David Leyonhjelm
Article Tools
Comment 62 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy